On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 22:56 +0300, ale...@pavlyuts.ru wrote:
> Dear Ken,
>
> First of all, there no fencing at all, it is off.
>
> Thanks great for your suggestion, probably I need to think about this
> way too, however, the project environment is not a good one to rely
> on fencing and,
Dear Ken,
First of all, there no fencing at all, it is off.
Thanks great for your suggestion, probably I need to think about this way too,
however, the project environment is not a good one to rely on fencing and,
moreover, we can't control the bottom layer a trusted way.
As I understand,
I don't see fencing times in here -- fencing is absolutely essential.
With the setup you describe, I would drop qdevice. With fencing, quorum
is not strictly required in a two-node cluster (two_node should be set
in corosync.conf). You can set priority-fencing-delay to reduce the
chance of
