Thanks, your explanation is very helpful considering that it happens rarely
and only on the first boot after VMs are created.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/19/2017 02:03 PM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
egdbx39-vm02 to dbx_ready_primary:0
[...]
Thanks in advance,
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/17/2017 06:10 PM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding ' 'op-status
> > attribute getti
ack_rsc_op:Preventing dbx_head_head from
re-starting anywhere: operation monitor failed 'not configured' (6)
* Example:
Could it be some hardware (VM hyperviser) issue?
Thanks in advance,
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData In
:
crm_xml_cleanup: Cleaning up memory from libxml2
Pacemaker built from github: 1.16
Help greatly appreciated.
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporated
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo
eck-in:
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporated
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mail
Thank you, however in my case this parameter does not change the described
behavior.
I have a more detail example:
order: res_A-clone -> res_B-clone -> res_C
when "res_C" is not on the node, which had "res_A" instance failed, it will
not be restarted, only "res_A" and "res_B" all instances will.
n such a case?
I can provide more details regarding the CIB configuration when needed.
Pacemaker 1.1.16-1.el6
OS: Linux CentOS 6
Thanks in advance,
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporated
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http:
Thanks,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/28/2017 01:26 PM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a situation when a cloned resource is being deployed only on some
> > of the nodes, even though this res
operly deployed node:
** Status on not properly deployed node:
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporated
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.
Thanks, just found that out as well.
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 09:26 AM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> > I have tried also as 'boolean_op', sorry did not mention this in the
> > original post (just as a rem
dhat.com> schrieb am 22.03.2017 um 00:18 in
> Nachricht
> <94b7e5fd-cb65-4775-71df-ca8983629...@redhat.com>:
> > On 03/21/2017 11:20 AM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a problem when creating rules with many expressions:
> >&
expression.
What do I do wrong when creating rules?
Pacemaker 1.1.16-1.el6
Written by Andrew Beekhof
Thank in advance for any help,
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporated
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clust
Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ulrich Windl <
ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> >>> Radoslaw Garbacz <radoslaw.garb...@xtremedatainc.com> schrieb am
> 06.12.2016 um
> 18:50 in Nachricht
> <cahbw7otjx0czdvaoo0cc+k6tds5phjmjr0_rsyrplppextv...@mail
_16:43:08 INFO:
swap_stop: Stopping resource
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporation
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
G
o...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 30/09/16 11:28 -0500, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> > I have posted a question about this error attached to another thread, but
> > because it was old and there is no answer I thought it could have been
> > missed, so I am sorry for repeating it.
&g
;>> > ^
>>> > 2016-06-08T14:11:46.010460+05:30 d18-fb-7b-18-f1-8e
>>> > pacemaker_remoted[6190]:error: XML Error: Entity: line 1: parser
>>> > error : Premature end of data in tag lrm_resource line 1
&g
cient bandwidth? I'm assuming that 99 of 100 nodes don't have an
> idle/standby role in the cluster.
>
> Regards,
> Ulrich
>
> >>> Radoslaw Garbacz <radoslaw.garb...@xtremedatainc.com> schrieb am
> 24.08.2016 um
> 19:49 in Nachricht
> <cahbw7oqoqt_9b
consensus: 16000
join: 1500
send_join: 80
merge: 2000
downcheck: 2000
max_network_delay: 150 # for azure
Best regards,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/23/2016 11:46 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> > On 08/23/2016 06:26 PM, Radosla
Thank you,
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 03:45 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> > Hello Radoslaw,
> >
> > On 02/05/16 11:47 -0500, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> >> When testing pacemaker I encountered a start e
als (48-98-2).
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
XtremeData Incorporation
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.
Caulfield <ccaul...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 09/11/15 22:20, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding the policy to check for cluster quorum for
> > corosync+pacemaker.
> >
> > As far as I know at present it is always (excpec
ice.
What are my options if I wanted to configure cluster with a different
quorum policy (compilation options are acceptable)?
Thanks in advance,
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailma
Thank you Ken and Digimer for all your suggestions.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 12:55 PM, Digimer wrote:
> > On 04/11/15 01:50 PM, Radoslaw Garbacz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a cluster o
just the CIB
synchronization fails, so this group seemed to me the right place.
--
Best Regards,
Radoslaw Garbacz
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getti
24 matches
Mail list logo
