Re: [ClusterLabs] Preferred node for a service (not constrained)

On 2020-11-30 23:21, Petr Bena wrote: Hello, Is there a way to setup a preferred node for a service? I know how to create constrain that will make it possible to run a service ONLY on certain node, or constrain that will make it impossible to run 2 services on same node, but I don't want any of

Re: [ClusterLabs] connection timed out fence_virsh monitor stonith

On 2020-02-24 12:17, Strahil Nikolov wrote: On February 24, 2020 4:56:07 PM GMT+02:00, Luke Camilleri wrote: Hello users, I would like to ask for assistance on the below setup please, mainly on the monitor fence timeout: I notice that the issue happens at 00:00 on both days . Have you

Re: [ClusterLabs] 2 node clusters - ipmi fencing

On 2020-02-21 08:51, Ricardo Esteves wrote: Hi, I'm trying to understand what is the objective of the constraints to have the fencing devices running on opposite node or on its own node or running all on the same node. Can you explain the difference? IPMI fencing involves the instance

Re: [ClusterLabs] 2 node clusters - ipmi fencing

I believe you in fact want each fence agent to run on the other node, yes. On February 20, 2020, at 6:23 PM, Ricardo Esteves wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding fencing, i have 2 physical servers: node01, node02, each one has an ipmi card so i create 2 fence devices: fence_ipmi_node01

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to unfence without reboot (fence_mpath)

Many people don't have red hat access, so linking those urls is not useful. On February 17, 2020, at 1:40 AM, Strahil Nikolov wrote: Hello Ondrej, thanks for your reply. I really appreciate that. I have picked fence_multipath as I'm preparing for my EX436 and I can't know what agent will be

Re: [ClusterLabs] Stonith configuration

On 2020-02-14 13:06, Strahil Nikolov wrote: On February 14, 2020 4:44:53 PM GMT+02:00, "BASDEN, ALASTAIR G." wrote: Hi Strahil, Note2: Consider adding a third node /for example a VM/ or a qdevice on a separate node (allows to be on a separate network, so a simple routing is the only

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence-scsi question

On 2020-02-10 00:06, Strahil Nikolov wrote: On February 10, 2020 2:07:01 AM GMT+02:00, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: I have a 2-node CentOS7 cluster running ZFS. The two nodes (vsphere appliances on different hosts) access 2 SAS SSD in a Supermicro JBOD with 2 mini-SAS connectors. It all works

[ClusterLabs] fence-scsi question

I have a 2-node CentOS7 cluster running ZFS. The two nodes (vsphere appliances on different hosts) access 2 SAS SSD in a Supermicro JBOD with 2 mini-SAS connectors. It all works fine - failover and all. My quandary was how to implement fencing. I was able to get both of the vmware SOAP

Re: [ClusterLabs] Non-cloned resource moves before cloned resource startup on unstandby

On 9/11/2018 9:20 AM, Dan Ragle wrote: On 9/11/2018 1:59 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: 07.09.2018 23:07, Dan Ragle пишет: On an active-active two node cluster with DRBD, dlm, filesystem mounts, a Web Server, and some crons I can't figure out how to have the crons jump from node to node

Re: [ClusterLabs] Non-cloned resource moves before cloned resource startup on unstandby

On 9/11/2018 1:59 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: 07.09.2018 23:07, Dan Ragle пишет: On an active-active two node cluster with DRBD, dlm, filesystem mounts, a Web Server, and some crons I can't figure out how to have the crons jump from node to node in the correct order. Specifically, I have two

[ClusterLabs] Non-cloned resource moves before cloned resource startup on unstandby

On an active-active two node cluster with DRBD, dlm, filesystem mounts, a Web Server, and some crons I can't figure out how to have the crons jump from node to node in the correct order. Specifically, I have two crontabs (managed via symlink creation/deletion) which normally will run one on

Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP won't return to recovered node

On 6/19/2017 5:32 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 06/16/2017 09:08 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/16/2017 01:18 PM, Dan Ragle wrote: On 6/12/2017 10:30 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/12/2017 09:23 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 06/12/2017 04:02 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/10/2017 10:53 AM, Dan

Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP won't return to recovered node

On 6/16/2017 3:08 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/16/2017 01:18 PM, Dan Ragle wrote: On 6/12/2017 10:30 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/12/2017 09:23 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 06/12/2017 04:02 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/10/2017 10:53 AM, Dan Ragle wrote: So I guess my bottom line

Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP won't return to recovered node

On 6/12/2017 10:30 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/12/2017 09:23 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 06/12/2017 04:02 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 06/10/2017 10:53 AM, Dan Ragle wrote: So I guess my bottom line question is: How does one tell Pacemaker that the individual legs of globally unique clones

Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP won't return to recovered node

On 6/12/2017 2:03 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 06/10/2017 05:53 PM, Dan Ragle wrote: On 5/25/2017 5:33 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 05/24/2017 12:27 PM, Dan Ragle wrote: I suspect this has been asked before and apologize if so, a google search didn't seem to find anything that was helpful

Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterIP won't return to recovered node

On 5/25/2017 5:33 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 05/24/2017 12:27 PM, Dan Ragle wrote: I suspect this has been asked before and apologize if so, a google search didn't seem to find anything that was helpful to me ... I'm setting up an active/active two-node cluster and am having an issue where

[ClusterLabs] ClusterIP won't return to recovered node

connected via the permanent IP on the NIC and not the clusterIP, to be dropped). Is there any way to avoid this? I was thinking that the cluster operations would only affect the ClusteIP and not the other IPs being served on that NIC. Thanks! Dan

Re: [ClusterLabs] Location constraints for fencing resources?

On 2016-09-13 00:20, Klaus Wenninger wrote: Location-constraints for fencing-resources are definitely supported and don't just work by accident - if this was the question. On 09/13/2016 02:43 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-09-12 10:48, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: Posting

Re: [ClusterLabs] Location constraints for fencing resources?

On 2016-09-12 10:48, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: Posting this as a separate thread from my fence_apc one. As I said in that thread, I created two fence_apc agents, one to fence node A and one to fence node B. Each was configured using a static pcmk node mapping, and constrained to only run

[ClusterLabs] Location constraints for fencing resources?

Posting this as a separate thread from my fence_apc one. As I said in that thread, I created two fence_apc agents, one to fence node A and one to fence node B. Each was configured using a static pcmk node mapping, and constrained to only run on the other node. In the process of testing

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_apc delay?

On 2016-09-06 10:59, Ken Gaillot wrote: [snip] I thought power-wait was intended for this situation, where the node's power supply can survive a brief outage, so a delay is needed to ensure it drains. In any case, I know people are using it for that. Are there any drawbacks to using

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: fence_apc delay?

On 2016-09-05 03:04, Ulrich Windl wrote: Marek Grac schrieb am 03.09.2016 um 14:41 in Nachricht : Hi, There are two problems mentioned in the email. 1) power-wait Power-wait is a quite advanced option and

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_apc delay?

On 2016-09-03 08:41, Marek Grac wrote: Hi, There are two problems mentioned in the email. 1) power-wait Power-wait is a quite advanced option and there are only few fence devices/agent where it makes sense. And only because the HW/firmware on the device is somewhat broken. Basically, when we

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_apc delay?

On 2016-09-02 10:09, Ken Gaillot wrote: On 09/02/2016 08:14 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: So, I was testing my ZFS dual-head JBOD 2-node cluster. Manual failovers worked just fine. I then went to try an acid-test by logging in to node A and doing 'systemctl stop network'. Sure enough

Re: [ClusterLabs] fence_apc delay?

It occurred to me folks reading this might not have any knowledge about ZFS. Think of my setup as an mdraid pool with a filesystem mounted on it, shared out via NFS. Same basic idea... ___ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org

[ClusterLabs] fence_apc delay?

So, I was testing my ZFS dual-head JBOD 2-node cluster. Manual failovers worked just fine. I then went to try an acid-test by logging in to node A and doing 'systemctl stop network'. Sure enough, pacemaker told the APC fencing agent to power-cycle node A. The ZFS pool moved to node B as

Re: [ClusterLabs] Solved: converting configuration

On 2016-08-25 10:24, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: YESSS!!! That was it! :))) Upgraded to 1.1.15, rebuilt and the rng files contain a lot more stuff. Packaged, published, installed on the test machine: got all my instructions as is!!! :))) ...now last stepsmaking our custom agents/shells work on

Re: [ClusterLabs] ClusterLabs] Failing over NFSv4/TCP exports

Thanks for the info. I only use esxi, which likely explains why I never had issues... Patrick Zwahlen wrote: >Hi, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andreas Kurz [mailto:andreas.k...@gmail.com] >> Sent: mercredi, 17 août 2016 23:16 >> To: Cluster Labs - All topics

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-06 21:59, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 08:22 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-06 19:46, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 07:33 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: (snip) What about using ipmitool directly? I can't imagine that such a long time is normal. Maybe there is a firmware

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-06 21:59, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 08:22 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-06 19:46, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 07:33 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: (snip) What about using ipmitool directly? I can't imagine that such a long time is normal. Maybe there is a firmware

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

Okay, I almost have this all working. fence_ipmilan for the supermicro host. Had to specify lanplus for it to work. fence_drac5 for the R905. That was failing to complete due to timeout. Found a couple of helpful posts that recommended increase the retry count to 3 and the timeout to

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

A lot of good suggestions here. Unfortunately, my budget is tapped out for the near future at least (this is a home lab/soho setup). I'm inclined to go with Digimer's two-node approach, with IPMI fencing. I understand mobos can die and such. In such a long-shot, manual intervention is

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-04 19:33, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 07:21 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it depends

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it depends on a ZFS resource agent which imports or exports a pool. So far, with stonith disabled

[ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it depends on a ZFS resource agent which imports or exports a pool. So far, with stonith disabled, it all works perfectly. I was dubious about a 2-node solution, so I created a 3rd

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Need bash instead of /bin/sh

ons 2015-09-23 klockan 14:08 +0200 skrev Ulrich Windl: > >>> dan <dan.oscars...@intraphone.com> schrieb am 23.09.2015 um 13:39 in > >>> Nachricht > <1443008370.2386.8.ca...@intraphone.com>: > > Hi > > > > As I had problem with corosy

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Need bash instead of /bin/sh

ons 2015-09-23 klockan 15:20 +0200 skrev Ulrich Windl: > >>> dan <dan.oscars...@intraphone.com> schrieb am 23.09.2015 um 14:42 in > >>> Nachricht > <1443012134.2386.11.ca...@intraphone.com>: > > ons 2015-09-23 klockan 14:08 +0200 skrev Ulrich Wind

[ClusterLabs] Need bash instead of /bin/sh

e 1 of the script). The current version in git looks like it has the same problem. Maybe you should switch to /bin/bash for scripts that need it as not everybody have /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash. Dan ___ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org h

Re: [ClusterLabs] Parser error with fence_ipmilan

mån 2015-09-14 klockan 10:02 +0200 skrev dan: > Hi > > To see if my cluster problem go away with a newer version of pacemaker I > have now installed pcemaker 1.1.12+git+a9c8177-3ubuntu1 and I had to get > 4.0.19-1 (ubuntu) of fence-agents to get a working fence-ipmilan. &g

[ClusterLabs] hanging after node shutdown

ome other idea what I can test/try to pin this down? Dan ___ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/