te_stonith_exec) debug: Finalizing action 'reboot'
targeting FILE-1 on behalf of pacemaker-controld.19415@FILE-6: OK | rc=0
id=446afc42
63957:Jul 17 14:18:20.101 FILE-2 pacemaker-fenced[15958]
(remote_op_done) notice: Operation 'reboot' targeting FILE-1 by FILE-5
for pacemaker-controld.194
-2 pacemaker-attrd [15960]
(crm_signal_dispatch)notice: Caught 'Terminated' signal | 15 (invoking
handler)
Could you please help me understand the issue here.
Regards
Priyanka
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman
I am using SLES 15 SP4. Is the no-quorum-policy still supported?
Thanks
Priyanka
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 12:46 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 22:38 +0530, Priyanka Balotra wrote:
> > In this case stonith has been configured as a resource,
> > primit
is up.
Stonith will then take care of any split-brain scenarios.
Thanks
Priyanka
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:06 PM Klaus Wenninger wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:24 PM Andrei Borzenkov
> wrote:
>
>> On 27.06.2023 07:21, Priyanka Balotra wrote:
>> > Hi
only one node of the cluster is up and others are
down we need the resources and cluster to be up .
Thanks
Priyanka
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:25 AM Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> On 26.06.2023 21:14, Priyanka Balotra wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > We are seeing an issue where we replaced n
et me know if any more info is needed.
Thanks
Priyanka
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
+Ayush
Thanks
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 8:17 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you can reproduce the problem, the following info would be helpful:
>
> * "cibadmin -Q | grep standby" : to show whether it was successfully
> recorded in the CIB (will show info for any node with standby, but the
>
corosync
corosync-2.4.5-10.14.6.1.x86_64
# rpm -qa crmsh
crmsh-4.2.0+git.1585096577.f3257c89-3.4.noarch
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:45 PM Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:46 PM Priyanka Balotra
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are seeing an is
[11643] had fatal failure
2022-06-19T07:02:08.694209+00:00 FILE-1 pacemakerd[11622]: notice:
Shutting down Pacemaker
2022-06-19T07:02:08.694381+00:00 FILE-1 pacemakerd[11622]: notice:
Stopping pacemaker-schedulerd
Let us know if you need any more logs to find an rca to this.
Thanks
Priyanka
2022 by root via cibadmin on FILE-2
* 2 nodes configured
* 9 resource instances configured
- How the current DC will be set to any node once we see as *None*?
- Is there any impact on cluster functionality?
Thanks
Priyanka
___
Manage your
fencing happened from stonith only.
Thanks in advance!
Priyanka
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
Balotra, Priyanka would like to recall the message, "Resources too_active
(active on all nodes of the cluster, instead of only 1 node)".
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs h
Hi All,
We have a scenario on SLES 12 SP3 cluster.
The scenario is explained as follows in the order of events:
* There is a 2-node cluster (FILE-1, FILE-2)
* The cluster and the resources were up and running fine initially .
* Then fencing request from pacemaker got issued on both
On 2015-10-08 20:52, emmanuel segura wrote:
please check if you drbd is configured to call fence-handler
https://drbd.linbit.com/users-guide/s-pacemaker-fencing.html
yes.
2015-10-08 17:16 GMT+02:00 priyanka <priya...@cse.iitb.ac.in>:
Hi,
We are trying to build a HA setup for our s
On 2015-10-08 21:05, Digimer wrote:
On 08/10/15 11:16 AM, priyanka wrote:
fencing resource-only;
This needs to be 'fencing resource-and-stonith;'.
I did set the suggested parameter but error persists. Apparently node
which comes back after fail-over is not able to detect
15 matches
Mail list logo
