Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

2016-09-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 09/23/2016 06:59 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote: >>> Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option > is not sufficient? > > Alongside with starting the cluster with two nodes I need that > possibility of starting the cluster with only one node. > "two_node" option

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

2016-09-23 Thread Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
>> Out of curiosity: What do you use it for, where the two_node option is not sufficient? Alongside with starting the cluster with two nodes I need that possibility of starting the cluster with only one node. "two_node" option doesn't provide that. Thank you, Kostia On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:33

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

2016-09-02 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Kostiantyn Ponomarenko writes: > Hi, > >>> If "scripts: no-quorum-policy=ignore" is becoming depreciated > Are there any plans to get rid of this option? > Am I missing something? The above is talking about crmsh cluster configuration scripts, not core

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

2016-09-01 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Darren Thompson writes: > Just a quick question: > > If "scripts: no-quorum-policy=ignore" is becoming depreciated, how are we > to manage two node (e.g. test) clusters that require this work around since > quorum state on a single node is an odd state. > Hi Darren,

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Linux-ha-dev] Announcing crmsh release 2.1.7

2016-09-01 Thread Darren Thompson
Team good work on the new version, appreciated. Just a quick question: If "scripts: no-quorum-policy=ignore" is becoming depreciated, how are we to manage two node (e.g. test) clusters that require this work around since quorum state on a single node is an odd state. Regards Darren