Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-06-15 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Jan Pokorný writes: >> 4. [ ] Do you use "tag" based syntactic grouping[3] in CIB? > > 0x > > keeps me at guess what it was meant to/could be used for in practice > (had some ideas but will gladly be surprised if anyone's going to > give it a crack) > The background for this feature as far as

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-06-14 Thread Adam Spiers
Jan Pokorný wrote: On 31/05/18 14:48 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively in your case (just tick the

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-06-14 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 31/05/18 14:48 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, > please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective > knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively > in your case (just tick the respective "[ ]"

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-06-07 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Jan Pokorný writes: > 1. [X] Do you edit CIB by hand (as opposed to relying on crm/pcs or > their UI counterparts)? For debugging one has to understand the CIB anyway, so why learn additional syntaxes? :) Most of our configuration changes are scripted via a home-grown domain-specific

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-06-07 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi, On 31.05.2018 15:48, Jan Pokorný wrote: Hello, I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively in your case (just tick the respective "[ ]"

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-06-05 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 31/05/18 14:48 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, > please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective > knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively > in your case (just tick the respective "[ ]"

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-05-31 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 31/05/18 11:42 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 14:48 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, >> please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective >> knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered

Re: [ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-05-31 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 14:48 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > Hello, > > I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, > please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective > knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively > in your case (just tick

[ClusterLabs] [questionnaire] Do you manage your pacemaker configuration by hand and (if so) what reusability features do you use?

2018-05-31 Thread Jan Pokorný
Hello, I am soliciting feedback on these CIB features related questions, please reply (preferably on-list so we have the shared collective knowledge) if at least one of the questions is answered positively in your case (just tick the respective "[ ]" boxes as "[x]"). Any other commentary also