18.10.2019 12:43, Raffaele Pantaleoni пишет:
>
> Il 18/10/2019 10:21, Andrei Borzenkov ha scritto:
>> According to it, you have symmetric cluster (and apparently made typo
>> trying to change it)
>>
>> > name="symmetric-cluster" value="true"/>
>> > name="symmectric-cluster"
On 18/10/19 17:59 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 18/10/19 11:21 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> According to it, you have symmetric cluster (and apparently made
>> typo trying to change it)
>>
>>
>> name="symmetric-cluster" value="true"/>
>>
>> name="symmectric-cluster"
On 18/10/19 11:21 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> According to it, you have symmetric cluster (and apparently made
> typo trying to change it)
>
>
> name="symmetric-cluster" value="true"/>
>
> name="symmectric-cluster" value="true"/>
Great spot, demonstrating how
Il 18/10/2019 10:21, Andrei Borzenkov ha scritto:
According to it, you have symmetric cluster (and apparently made typo
trying to change it)
That's correct. I tried both approaches, opt in explicitly allowing nodes to be
bound to resources. Then I tried the opt out
According to it, you have symmetric cluster (and apparently made typo
trying to change it)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:29 AM Raffaele Pantaleoni
wrote:
>
> Il 17/10/2019 18:08, Ken Gaillot ha scritto:
> > This does sound odd, possibly a bug. Can you provide the output of "pcs
>
Il 17/10/2019 18:08, Ken Gaillot ha scritto:
This does sound odd, possibly a bug. Can you provide the output of "pcs
cluster cib" when one of the unexpected results is happening? (Strip
out any passwords or other sensitive information, and you can e-mail it
to me privately if you don't want it
This does sound odd, possibly a bug. Can you provide the output of "pcs
cluster cib" when one of the unexpected results is happening? (Strip
out any passwords or other sensitive information, and you can e-mail it
to me privately if you don't want it on the list.)
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 16:55
Il 17/10/2019 16:47, Raffaele Pantaleoni ha scritto:
Il 17/10/2019 14:51, Jan Pokorný ha scritto:
On 17/10/19 08:22 +0200, Raffaele Pantaleoni wrote:
I'm rather new to Pacemaker, I'm performing early tests on a set of
three virtual machines.
I am configuring the cluster in the following way:
Il 17/10/2019 14:51, Jan Pokorný ha scritto:
On 17/10/19 08:22 +0200, Raffaele Pantaleoni wrote:
I'm rather new to Pacemaker, I'm performing early tests on a set of
three virtual machines.
I am configuring the cluster in the following way:
3 nodes configured
4 resources configured
Online: [
On 17/10/19 08:22 +0200, Raffaele Pantaleoni wrote:
> I'm rather new to Pacemaker, I'm performing early tests on a set of
> three virtual machines.
>
> I am configuring the cluster in the following way:
>
> 3 nodes configured
> 4 resources configured
>
> Online: [ SRVDRSW01 SRVDRSW02 SRVDRSW03
Hello,
I'm rather new to Pacemaker, I'm performing early tests on a set of
three virtual machines.
I am configuring the cluster in the following way:
3 nodes configured
4 resources configured
Online: [ SRVDRSW01 SRVDRSW02 SRVDRSW03 ]
ClusterIP (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started
11 matches
Mail list logo
