Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Help understanding recover of promotable resource after a "pcs cluster stop ‑‑all"

2022-05-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 03.05.2022 10:40, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > I don't use DRBD, but I can imagine: > If DRBD does asynchronous replication, it may make sense not to promote the > slave as master after an interrupte dconnection (such when the master died) > (as > this will cause some data loss). > Probably

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Help understanding recover of promotable resource after a "pcs cluster stop ‑‑all"

2022-05-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I don't use DRBD, but I can imagine: If DRBD does asynchronous replication, it may make sense not to promote the slave as master after an interrupte dconnection (such when the master died) (as this will cause some data loss). Probably it only wants to switch roles when both nodes are online

[ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] Re: Help understanding recover of promotable resource after a "pcs cluster stop ‑‑all"

2022-05-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 02.05.2022 um 23:25 in Nachricht <94927004ea4d4dca222ebc842f62711ff73b0a2a.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Mon, 2022‑05‑02 at 13:11 ‑0300, Salatiel Filho wrote: >> Hi, Ken, here is the info you asked for. >> >> >> # pcs constraint >> Location Constraints: >> Resource: