On Saturday, August 6, 2022, Strahil Nikolov via Users <
users@clusterlabs.org> wrote:
> By the way I remember a lot of problems with fence_ilo & fence_ilo_ssh
(due to ILO).
> If you receive timeouts use fence_ipmi (you have to enable IPMI in ILO).
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
Of the two,
On Thursday, August 4, 2022, Lentes, Bernd <
bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de> wrote:
> - On 4 Aug, 2022, at 19:46, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
>
>>> It shuts down ha-idg-2:
>>> 2022-08-03T01:19:51.866200+02:00 ha-idg-2 systemd-logind[1535]: Power
key
>>> pressed.
>>>
- On 4 Aug, 2022, at 19:46, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
>> It shuts down ha-idg-2:
>> 2022-08-03T01:19:51.866200+02:00 ha-idg-2 systemd-logind[1535]: Power key
>> pressed.
>> 2022-08-03T01:19:52.048335+02:00 ha-idg-2 systemd-logind[1535]: System is
>> powering down.
>>
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 7:40 AM Lentes, Bernd
wrote:
>
>
> - On 4 Aug, 2022, at 15:14, arvidjaar arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On 04.08.2022 16:06, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> >>
> >> - On 4 Aug, 2022, at 00:27, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Would do you mean by "banned" ? "crm
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 6:07 AM Lentes, Bernd
wrote:
>
>
> - On 4 Aug, 2022, at 00:27, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Such constraints are unnecessary.
> >
> > Let's say we have two stonith devices called "fence_dev1" and
> > "fence_dev2" that fence nodes 1 and 2, respectively. If
- On 4 Aug, 2022, at 15:14, arvidjaar arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 04.08.2022 16:06, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>>
>> - On 4 Aug, 2022, at 00:27, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>> Would do you mean by "banned" ? "crm resource ban ..." ?
>> Is that something different than a location
On 04.08.2022 16:06, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> - On 4 Aug, 2022, at 00:27, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Such constraints are unnecessary.
>>
>> Let's say we have two stonith devices called "fence_dev1" and
>> "fence_dev2" that fence nodes 1 and 2, respectively. If node 2 needs
>>
- On 4 Aug, 2022, at 00:27, Reid Wahl nw...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> Such constraints are unnecessary.
>
> Let's say we have two stonith devices called "fence_dev1" and
> "fence_dev2" that fence nodes 1 and 2, respectively. If node 2 needs
> to be fenced, and fence_dev2 is running on node 2,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 2:59 PM Lentes, Bernd
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have the following situation:
> 2-node Cluster, just one node running (ha-idg-1).
> The second node (ha-idg-2) is in standby. DLM monitor on ha-idg-1 times out.
> Cluster tries to restart all services depending on DLM:
> Aug 03
Hi,
i have the following situation:
2-node Cluster, just one node running (ha-idg-1).
The second node (ha-idg-2) is in standby. DLM monitor on ha-idg-1 times out.
Cluster tries to restart all services depending on DLM:
Aug 03 01:07:11 [19367] ha-idg-1pengine: notice: LogAction:*
10 matches
Mail list logo
