On 05/05/2017 07:49 AM, Jan Wrona wrote:
> On 5.5.2017 08:15, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Jan Wrona schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 16:41 in
> Nachricht
>> :
>>> I hope I'll be able to explain the problem clearly and correctly.
>>>
>>>
On 05/05/2017 07:49 AM, Jan Wrona wrote:
> But AFAIK Pacemaker should work properly even with
> disabled STONITH and the state I've run into doesn't seem right to me at
> all.
The keyword here is *should*. In my case the kernel (according to
lsof/fuser) keeps an open file descriptor on the DRBD
On 5.5.2017 08:15, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Jan Wrona schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 16:41 in Nachricht
:
I hope I'll be able to explain the problem clearly and correctly.
My setup (simplified): I have two cloned resources, a filesystem
>>> Jan Wrona schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 16:41 in Nachricht
:
> I hope I'll be able to explain the problem clearly and correctly.
>
> My setup (simplified): I have two cloned resources, a filesystem mount
> and a process which