Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Behavior after stop action failure with the failure-timeout set and STONITH disabled

2017-05-08 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 05/05/2017 07:49 AM, Jan Wrona wrote: > On 5.5.2017 08:15, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Jan Wrona schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 16:41 in > Nachricht >> : >>> I hope I'll be able to explain the problem clearly and correctly. >>> >>>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Behavior after stop action failure with the failure-timeout set and STONITH disabled

2017-05-05 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 05/05/2017 07:49 AM, Jan Wrona wrote: > But AFAIK Pacemaker should work properly even with > disabled STONITH and the state I've run into doesn't seem right to me at > all. The keyword here is *should*. In my case the kernel (according to lsof/fuser) keeps an open file descriptor on the DRBD

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Behavior after stop action failure with the failure-timeout set and STONITH disabled

2017-05-05 Thread Jan Wrona
On 5.5.2017 08:15, Ulrich Windl wrote: Jan Wrona schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 16:41 in Nachricht : I hope I'll be able to explain the problem clearly and correctly. My setup (simplified): I have two cloned resources, a filesystem

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Behavior after stop action failure with the failure-timeout set and STONITH disabled

2017-05-05 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Jan Wrona schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 16:41 in Nachricht : > I hope I'll be able to explain the problem clearly and correctly. > > My setup (simplified): I have two cloned resources, a filesystem mount > and a process which