Ken Gaillot writes:
> Bloat is definitely an issue to consider when adding features. I try to
> weigh how many users might be interested, how isolated the new code can
> be from other code, whether the feature has any performance impact when
> not configured, what
On 08/11/2016 03:35 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 09:13 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 10.08.2016 um 22:36 in
> Nachricht
>> <804dd911-56a6-328c-00a4-43133f59d...@redhat.com>:
>>> Have you ever changed a resource agent in a
On 08/11/2016 09:13 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Ken Gaillot schrieb am 10.08.2016 um 22:36 in
Nachricht
> <804dd911-56a6-328c-00a4-43133f59d...@redhat.com>:
>> Have you ever changed a resource agent in a backward-incompatible way,
>> and found yourself wishing you
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 10.08.2016 um 22:36 in
>>> Nachricht
<804dd911-56a6-328c-00a4-43133f59d...@redhat.com>:
> Have you ever changed a resource agent in a backward-incompatible way,
> and found yourself wishing you could do a rolling upgrade?
Hi!
It seems you are