Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing

2020-08-18 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
18.08.2020 10:10, Ulrich Windl пишет: Ken Gaillot schrieb am 17.08.2020 um 17:19 in > Nachricht > <73d6ecf113098a3154a2e7db2e2a59557272024a.ca...@redhat.com>: >> On Fri, 2020‑08‑14 at 15:09 +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: >>> Thanks to all your suggestions, I now have the systems with stonith

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing

2020-08-18 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 17.08.2020 um 17:19 in Nachricht <73d6ecf113098a3154a2e7db2e2a59557272024a.ca...@redhat.com>: > On Fri, 2020‑08‑14 at 15:09 +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: >> Thanks to all your suggestions, I now have the systems with stonith >> configured on ipmi. > > A word of

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing

2020-07-29 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
-- Da: Ulrich Windl A: users@clusterlabs.org Data: 29 luglio 2020 9.26.39 CEST Oggetto: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 29.07.2020 um 08:01 in Nachricht : That one was taken from a specific implementation on Solaris 11. The situation is a dual

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing

2020-07-29 Thread Reid Wahl
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 2:48 AM Ulrich Windl < ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >>> Reid Wahl schrieb am 29.07.2020 um 11:39 in > Nachricht > : > > "As it stated in the comments, we don't want to halt or boot via ssh, > only > > reboot." > > > > Generally speaking, a stonith reboot

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing

2020-07-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Reid Wahl schrieb am 29.07.2020 um 11:39 in Nachricht : > "As it stated in the comments, we don't want to halt or boot via ssh, only > reboot." > > Generally speaking, a stonith reboot action consists of the following basic > sequence of events: > >1. Execute the fence agent with the

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Stonith failing

2020-07-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 29.07.2020 um 08:01 in Nachricht <603366395.379.1596002482554@www>: > That one was taken from a specific implementation on Solaris 11. > The situation is a dual node server with shared storage controller: both > nodes see the same disks concurrently. You mean you