Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: OCFS2 on cLVM with node waiting for fencing timeout

2016-10-13 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 10/13/2016 03:36 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > That's what I'm talking about: If 1 of 3 nodes is rebooting (or the cluster > is split-brain 1:2), the single node CANNOT continue due to lack of quorum, > while the remaining two nodes can. Is it still necessary to wait for > completion of stonith?

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: OCFS2 on cLVM with node waiting for fencing timeout

2016-10-13 Thread Eric Ren
Hi, On 10/13/2016 04:36 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Eric Ren schrieb am 13.10.2016 um 09:48 in Nachricht <73f764d0-75e7-122f-ff4e-d0b27dbdd...@suse.com>: [...] When assuming node h01 still lived when communication failed, wouldn't quorum prevent h01 from doing anything with DLM

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: OCFS2 on cLVM with node waiting for fencing timeout

2016-10-13 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Eric Ren schrieb am 13.10.2016 um 09:48 in Nachricht <73f764d0-75e7-122f-ff4e-d0b27dbdd...@suse.com>: [...] >> When assuming node h01 still lived when communication failed, wouldn't > quorum prevent h01 from doing anything with DLM and OCFS2 anyway? > Not sure I understand you