Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: no clone for pcs-based cluster fencing?

2016-03-21 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 03/21/2016 09:34 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Ken Gaillot schrieb am 21.03.2016 um 15:22 in Nachricht > <56f003b0.4020...@redhat.com>: > > [...] >> It's actually newer pacemaker versions rather than pcs itself. Fence >> agents do not need to be cloned, or even

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: no clone for pcs-based cluster fencing?

2016-03-21 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 21.03.2016 um 15:22 in >>> Nachricht <56f003b0.4020...@redhat.com>: [...] > It's actually newer pacemaker versions rather than pcs itself. Fence > agents do not need to be cloned, or even running -- as long as they're > configured and enabled, any