Hi Bernd,
Apart from Ken's insights.
I try to put it simple between systemd vs. pacemaker:
pacemaker does manage dependencies among nodes, well, systemd just not.
Cheers,
Roger
On 10/16/19 5:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 21:35 +0200, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm a
Hello Lentes,o
In the cluster environment, usually we need to fence(or dynamically add/delete)
node,
the full stacks provided by packmaker/corosync can help to complete it
automatically/integrally.
Thanks
Gang
From: Users on behalf of Lentes, Bernd
Sent:
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 21:35 +0200, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS).
> Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2 managed by pacemaker.
> They all are fundamental prerequisites for my resources (Virtual
> Domains).
> To configure them i used clones and
Hi,
i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS).
Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2 managed by pacemaker.
They all are fundamental prerequisites for my resources (Virtual Domains).
To configure them i used clones and groups.
Why not having them managed by systemd to make the cluster setup
