Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

>> Agree. So far I haven't created any ordering constraints because it >> isn't important to me, YET, the order for starting services. However I >> have a question... if I don't have any ordering constraints at all, am >> I still able to activate resources no matter the order? > > Sort of, but not

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

On 04/07/2016 10:30 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote: >> FYI, commands that "move" a resource do so by adding location >> constraints. The ID of these constraints will start with "cli-". They >> override the normal behavior of the cluster, and stay in effect until >> you explicitly remove them. (With pcs,

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

> FYI, commands that "move" a resource do so by adding location > constraints. The ID of these constraints will start with "cli-". They > override the normal behavior of the cluster, and stay in effect until > you explicitly remove them. (With pcs, you can remove them with "pcs > resource clear".)

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

On 04/06/2016 09:29 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote: > Hey guys: > > I've been reading a little bit more about rules but there are certain > things that are not so clear to me yet. First, I've created 3 normal > resources and one master/slave resource (clusterdataClone). My > resources and constraints

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

I started reading "Pacemaker explained" but as it's so depth I didn't read that section regarding rules yet. I'll take a look at it and test it before asking anything again. Thanks a lot Ken On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 04/02/2016 01:16 AM, Jason

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

On 04/02/2016 01:16 AM, Jason Voorhees wrote: > Hello guys: > > I've been recently reading "Pacemaker - Clusters from scratch" and > working on a CentOS 7 system with pacemaker 1.1.13, corosync-2.3.4 and > drbd84-utils-8.9.5. > > The PDF instructs how to create a DRBD resource that seems to be >

[ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

Hello guys: I've been recently reading "Pacemaker - Clusters from scratch" and working on a CentOS 7 system with pacemaker 1.1.13, corosync-2.3.4 and drbd84-utils-8.9.5. The PDF instructs how to create a DRBD resource that seems to be automatically started due to a symmetric-cluster setup.