Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-06 21:59, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 08:22 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-06 19:46, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 07:33 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: (snip) What about using ipmitool directly? I can't imagine that such a long time is normal. Maybe there is a firmware

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-06 21:59, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 08:22 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-06 19:46, Digimer wrote: On 06/08/16 07:33 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: (snip) What about using ipmitool directly? I can't imagine that such a long time is normal. Maybe there is a firmware

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 06/08/16 08:22 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > On 2016-08-06 19:46, Digimer wrote: >> On 06/08/16 07:33 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: >>> >>> Okay, I almost have this all working. fence_ipmilan for the supermicro >>> host. Had to specify lanplus for it to work. fence_drac5 for the R905. >>>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

Okay, I almost have this all working. fence_ipmilan for the supermicro host. Had to specify lanplus for it to work. fence_drac5 for the R905. That was failing to complete due to timeout. Found a couple of helpful posts that recommended increase the retry count to 3 and the timeout to

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

A lot of good suggestions here. Unfortunately, my budget is tapped out for the near future at least (this is a home lab/soho setup). I'm inclined to go with Digimer's two-node approach, with IPMI fencing. I understand mobos can die and such. In such a long-shot, manual intervention is

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Digimer wrote: > On 04/08/16 11:44 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> 05.08.2016 02:33, Digimer пишет: >>> On 04/08/16 07:21 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: > On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 04/08/16 11:44 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 05.08.2016 02:33, Digimer пишет: >> On 04/08/16 07:21 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: >>> On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: > I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

05.08.2016 02:33, Digimer пишет: > On 04/08/16 07:21 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: >> On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: >>> On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-04 19:33, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 07:21 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it depends on a

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

On 2016-08-04 19:03, Digimer wrote: On 04/08/16 06:56 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote: I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it depends on a ZFS resource agent which imports or exports a pool. So far, with stonith disabled, it

[ClusterLabs] Fencing with a 3-node (1 for quorum only) cluster

I'm setting up an HA NFS server to serve up storage to a couple of vsphere hosts. I have a virtual IP, and it depends on a ZFS resource agent which imports or exports a pool. So far, with stonith disabled, it all works perfectly. I was dubious about a 2-node solution, so I created a 3rd