Re: [ClusterLabs] How much cluster-glue support is still needed in Pacemaker?

Hi, On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:32:45AM +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > Ken Gaillot writes: > > > We're starting work on Pacemaker 2.0, which will remove support for the > > heartbeat stack. > > > > cluster-glue was traditionally associated with heartbeat. Do current > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] How much cluster-glue support is still needed in Pacemaker?

17.11.2017 02:26, Ken Gaillot wrote: We're starting work on Pacemaker 2.0, which will remove support for the heartbeat stack. cluster-glue was traditionally associated with heartbeat. Do current distributions still ship it? Currently, Pacemaker uses cluster-glue's stonith/stonith.h to support

Re: [ClusterLabs] How much cluster-glue support is still needed in Pacemaker?

Ken Gaillot writes: > We're starting work on Pacemaker 2.0, which will remove support for the > heartbeat stack. > > cluster-glue was traditionally associated with heartbeat. Do current > distributions still ship it? > > Currently, Pacemaker uses cluster-glue's

[ClusterLabs] How much cluster-glue support is still needed in Pacemaker?

We're starting work on Pacemaker 2.0, which will remove support for the heartbeat stack. cluster-glue was traditionally associated with heartbeat. Do current distributions still ship it? Currently, Pacemaker uses cluster-glue's stonith/stonith.h to support heartbeat-class stonith agents via the