Re: [ClusterLabs] Minor bug in SLES 15 corosync-2.4.5-6.3.2.x86_64 (unicast, ttl)

2020-11-20 Thread Jan Friesse
Ulrich, Hi! A short notification: I had set up a new cluster using udpu, finding that ringnumber 0 has a ttl statement ("ttl:1"), but ringnumber 1 had not. So I added one for ringnumber 1, and then I reloaded corosync via corosync-cfgtool -R. probably ttl with value different from 1

[ClusterLabs] Minor bug in SLES 15 corosync-2.4.5-6.3.2.x86_64 (unicast, ttl)

2020-11-19 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! A short notification: I had set up a new cluster using udpu, finding that ringnumber 0 has a ttl statement ("ttl:1"), but ringnumber 1 had not. So I added one for ringnumber 1, and then I reloaded corosync via corosync-cfgtool -R. Amazingly when (re)starting corosync, it failed with: