On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:03:34 +0100
lejeczek wrote:
> On 10/04/2021 16:19, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> >
> > Le 10 avril 2021 14:22:34 GMT+02:00, lejeczek a
> > écrit :
> >> Hi guys.
> >>
> >> Any users perhaps experts on PAF agent if happen to read
> >> this - a question - with
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 04:21:02 + (UTC)
Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> Better check for a location constraint created via 'pcs resource move'!pcs
> constraint location --full | grep cli Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
Oh, yes this is a good one, this should probably enters in our FAQ.
Thanks,
On 10/04/2021 16:19, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Le 10 avril 2021 14:22:34 GMT+02:00, lejeczek a écrit :
Hi guys.
Any users perhaps experts on PAF agent if happen to read
this - a question - with pretty regular 3-node cluster when
node on which "master" runs goes down then
Better check for a location constraint created via 'pcs resource move'!pcs
constraint location --full | grep cli
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 18:19, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
Le 10 avril 2021 14:22:34 GMT+02:00, lejeczek a écrit :
>Hi guys.
>
>Any
Hi guys.
Any users perhaps experts on PAF agent if happen to read
this - a question - with pretty regular 3-node cluster when
node on which "master" runs goes down then cluster/agent
successfully moves 'master' to a next node. but..
When node which held master, which was off/down, comes back
Le 10 avril 2021 14:22:34 GMT+02:00, lejeczek a écrit :
>Hi guys.
>
>Any users perhaps experts on PAF agent if happen to read
>this - a question - with pretty regular 3-node cluster when
>node on which "master" runs goes down then cluster/agent
>successfully moves 'master' to a next node.
