On 03/06/2017 10:55 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:31:33PM -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 03/01/2017 05:28 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lars Ellenberg
>>> wrote:
When I recently tried to make use of the
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:31:33PM -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 05:28 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lars Ellenberg
> > wrote:
> >> When I recently tried to make use of the DEGRADED monitoring results,
> >> I found out that
On 03/01/2017 05:28 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lars Ellenberg
> wrote:
>> When I recently tried to make use of the DEGRADED monitoring results,
>> I found out that it does still not work.
>>
>> Because LRMD choses to filter them in
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lars Ellenberg
wrote:
> When I recently tried to make use of the DEGRADED monitoring results,
> I found out that it does still not work.
>
> Because LRMD choses to filter them in ocf2uniform_rc(),
> and maps them to
When I recently tried to make use of the DEGRADED monitoring results,
I found out that it does still not work.
Because LRMD choses to filter them in ocf2uniform_rc(),
and maps them to PCMK_OCF_UNKNOWN_ERROR.
See patch suggestion below.
It also filters away the other "special" rc values.
Do we