On 04/10/2017 10:22 PM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 12:11 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> When fencing puts my vehicle in a "known" state, I'd want to be very
>> sure it's the *safe* state.
>
> *safe* for -- the other vehicles driving along...
> So instant vaporization would probably
On 04/10/2017 03:58 PM, Chad Cravens wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> we have implemented large cluster solutions for complex server
> environments that had databases, application servers, apache web servers
> and implemented fencing with the IPMI fencing agent.
>
> However, we are considering if
On 04/11/2017 12:11 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 03:58 PM, Chad Cravens wrote:
>
>> However, we are considering if pacemaker would be a good solution for high
>> availability for an embedded control system that integrates with CAN for
>> vehicles?
> When fencing puts my vehicle in a
On 04/10/2017 03:58 PM, Chad Cravens wrote:
> However, we are considering if pacemaker would be a good solution for high
> availability for an embedded control system that integrates with CAN for
> vehicles?
When fencing puts my vehicle in a "known" state, I'd want to be very
sure it's the
Hello all:
we have implemented large cluster solutions for complex server environments
that had databases, application servers, apache web servers and implemented
fencing with the IPMI fencing agent.
However, we are considering if pacemaker would be a good solution for high
availability for an
