Ken Gaillot writes:
> On 02/03/2017 07:00 AM, RaSca wrote:
>>
>> On 03/02/2017 11:06, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>>> Ken Gaillot writes:
>>>
On 01/10/2017 04:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu
On 03/02/2017 11:06, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
>> On 01/10/2017 04:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
>>
>>> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup
>>> seems to be working ok including the STONITH.
>>> For test purposes I
Ken Gaillot writes:
> On 01/10/2017 04:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
>
>> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup
>> seems to be working ok including the STONITH.
>> For test purposes I issued a "pkill -f pace" killing all pacemaker
>>
On 10/01/17 05:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup seems
> to be working ok including the STONITH.
> For test purposes I issued a "pkill -f pace" killing all pacemaker processes
> on one node.
>
> Result:
> The node is
On 01/10/2017 04:24 AM, Stefan Schloesser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup seems
> to be working ok including the STONITH.
> For test purposes I issued a "pkill -f pace" killing all pacemaker processes
> on one node.
>
> Result:
> The node
Hi,
I am currently testing a 2 node cluster under Ubuntu 16.04. The setup seems to
be working ok including the STONITH.
For test purposes I issued a "pkill -f pace" killing all pacemaker processes on
one node.
Result:
The node is marked as "pending", all resources stay on it. If I manually