I change my setting from clusterip_hash="sourceip-sourceport" to
clusterip_hash="sourceip".
And try to ping.
>From one host (not a node) on the network, I get no answer.
>From another host (not a node) on the network I get:
PING 10.0.0.97 (10.0.0.97) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.97:
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 11:36 AM, al...@amisw.com wrote:
>
>> Maybe I'm missing something here, and if so, my apologies, but to me it
>> looks like you are trying to put the same IP address on three different
>> machines SIMULTANEOUSLY.
>
> Yes it what I do. But it's seem normal for me, I
> ... For me, this work with arp multicast, who give same "virtual" arp
> to different hosts
Every hosts in the cluster get the request, and a modulo choose which one
answer. It's just how I understand this shared ip.
___
Users mailing list:
> Maybe I'm missing something here, and if so, my apologies, but to me it
> looks like you are trying to put the same IP address on three different
> machines SIMULTANEOUSLY.
Yes it what I do. But it's seem normal for me, I just follow guide like
Maybe I'm missing something here, and if so, my apologies, but to me it looks like you are trying to put the same IP address on three different machines SIMULTANEOUSLY. This will never work from a networking standpoint - it has nothing to do with pacemaker, etc, other than that it is
> 3 Nodes A B C.
> If resource on:
> A + B => ok
> Only A => ok
> Only B => ok
> Only C => ok
> A + C => random fail
> B + C => random fail
> A + B + C => random fail
I use same corosync / pacemaker on three host, but:
Host A & B have same kernel, C is different:
A & B : 3.7.10-1.45-desktop
C:
Hi,
My problem is still here. I search but don't find. I try to change network
cable to put the 3 hosts together on same switch, but same problem.
So with this:
primitive ip_apache_localnet ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
params ip="10.0.0.99" \
cidr_netmask="32" op monitor interval="30s"
clone
Hi,
I got some trouble since one week and can't find solution by myself. Any
help will be really appreciated !
I use corosync / pacemaker for 3 or 4 years and all works well, for
failover or load-balancing.
I have shared ip between 3 servers, and need to remove one for upgrade.
But after I
> On 12/15/2016 02:02 PM, al...@amisw.com wrote:
>> primitive ip_apache_localnet ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params ip="10.0.0.99"
>> cidr_netmask="32" op monitor interval="30s"
>> clone cl_ip_apache_localnet ip_apache_localnet \
>> meta globally-unique="true" clone-max="3" clone-node-max="1"
>
On 12/15/2016 02:02 PM, al...@amisw.com wrote:
>>
>> Seeing your configuration might help. Did you set globally-unique=true
>> and clone-node-max=3 on the clone? If not, the other nodes can't pick up
>> the lost node's share of requests.
>
> Yes for both, I have globally-unique=true, and I change
>
> Seeing your configuration might help. Did you set globally-unique=true
> and clone-node-max=3 on the clone? If not, the other nodes can't pick up
> the lost node's share of requests.
Yes for both, I have globally-unique=true, and I change clone-node-max=3
to clone-node-max=2, and now, as I
On 12/15/2016 12:37 PM, al...@amisw.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got some trouble since one week and can't find solution by myself. Any
> help will be really appreciated !
> I use corosync / pacemaker for 3 or 4 years and all works well, for
> failover or load-balancing.
>
> I have shared ip between 3
Hi,
I got some trouble since one week and can't find solution by myself. Any
help will be really appreciated !
I use corosync / pacemaker for 3 or 4 years and all works well, for
failover or load-balancing.
I have shared ip between 3 servers, and need to remove one for upgrade.
But after I
13 matches
Mail list logo
