On 2021-01-26 11:27 a.m., Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 11:03 -0500, Digimer wrote:
>> On 2021-01-26 10:15 a.m., Tomas Jelinek wrote:
>>> Dne 25. 01. 21 v 17:01 Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
> Hi Digimer,
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 11:03 -0500, Digimer wrote:
> On 2021-01-26 10:15 a.m., Tomas Jelinek wrote:
> > Dne 25. 01. 21 v 17:01 Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Digimer,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:15:55 +0100
Tomas Jelinek wrote:
> Dne 25. 01. 21 v 17:01 Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> >> Hi Digimer,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
> >> Digimer wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> I had a test
On 2021-01-26 10:15 a.m., Tomas Jelinek wrote:
> Dne 25. 01. 21 v 17:01 Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
>> On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>>> Hi Digimer,
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
>>> Digimer wrote:
>>> [...]
I had a test server (srv01-test)
Dne 25. 01. 21 v 17:01 Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Hi Digimer,
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
Digimer wrote:
[...]
I had a test server (srv01-test) running on node 1 (el8-a01n01),
and on
node 2 (el8-a01n02) I ran 'pcs
On 2021-01-25 3:58 p.m., Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 13:18 -0500, Digimer wrote:
>> On 2021-01-25 11:01 a.m., Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
>>> wrote:
Hi Digimer,
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
Digimer
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 13:18 -0500, Digimer wrote:
> On 2021-01-25 11:01 a.m., Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Digimer,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
> > > Digimer wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > I had a test
On 2021-01-25 11:01 a.m., Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>> Hi Digimer,
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
>> Digimer wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I had a test server (srv01-test) running on node 1 (el8-a01n01),
>>> and on
>>> node 2
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:51 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> Hi Digimer,
>
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
> Digimer wrote:
> [...]
> > I had a test server (srv01-test) running on node 1 (el8-a01n01),
> > and on
> > node 2 (el8-a01n02) I ran 'pcs cluster stop --all'.
> >
> >
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 14:01 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:07 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> wrote:
>
> > As actions during a cluster shutdown cannot be handled in the same
> > transition
> > for each nodes, I usually add a step to disable all resources using
> >
On 1/25/21 9:51 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> Hi Digimer,
>
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
> Digimer wrote:
> [...]
>> I had a test server (srv01-test) running on node 1 (el8-a01n01), and on
>> node 2 (el8-a01n02) I ran 'pcs cluster stop --all'.
>>
>> It appears like pacemaker
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:07 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
> As actions during a cluster shutdown cannot be handled in the same transition
> for each nodes, I usually add a step to disable all resources using property
> "stop-all-resources" before shutting down the cluster:
>
> pcs
Hi Digimer,
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:31:22 -0500
Digimer wrote:
[...]
> I had a test server (srv01-test) running on node 1 (el8-a01n01), and on
> node 2 (el8-a01n02) I ran 'pcs cluster stop --all'.
>
> It appears like pacemaker asked the VM to migrate to node 2 instead of
> stopping it. Once
I think that it makes sense, as '--all' should mean 'reach all servers and
shutdown there'.Yet, when you run 'pcs cluster stop' - the migration of the
resources is the only option.
Still, it sounds like a bug.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Sun, Jan 24,
Hi all,
Right off the bat; I'm using a custom RA so this behaviour might be a
bug in my agent.
I had a test server (srv01-test) running on node 1 (el8-a01n01), and on
node 2 (el8-a01n02) I ran 'pcs cluster stop --all'.
It appears like pacemaker asked the VM to migrate to node 2 instead of
15 matches
Mail list logo