Re: [ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior

2018-07-18 Thread Confidential Company
n-fence2-ArcosRhel1-INFINITY) >>>> Ordering Constraints: >>>> Colocation Constraints: >>>> Ticket Constraints: >>>> >>>> Alerts: >>>> ? No alerts defined >>>> >>>> Resources Defaults: >>>>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior

2018-07-18 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 07/18/2018 06:22 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 18.07.2018 04:21, Confidential Company пишет: Hi, On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I >>> expected that both nodes will be stonithed

Re: [ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior

2018-07-17 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
18.07.2018 04:21, Confidential Company пишет: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via >>> fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I >> expected >>> that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously. >>> >>> On my test scenario, Node1 has

Re: [ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior

2018-07-17 Thread Confidential Company
> > Hi, > > > > On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via > > fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I > expected > > that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously. > > > > On my test scenario, Node1 has ClusterIP resource. When I > disconnect > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior

2018-07-17 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 21:29 +0800, Confidential Company wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via > > fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I > expected > > that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously. > > > > On my test

[ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior

2018-07-17 Thread Confidential Company
> Hi, > > On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via > fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I expected > that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously. > > On my test scenario, Node1 has ClusterIP resource. When I disconnect > service/corosync link

Re: [ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior?

2018-07-17 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Confidential Company wrote: > Hi, > > On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via > fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I expected > that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously. > > On my test scenario, Node1 has

[ClusterLabs] Weird Fencing Behavior?

2018-07-17 Thread Confidential Company
Hi, On my two-node active/passive setup, I configured fencing via fence_vmware_soap. I configured pcmk_delay=0 on both nodes so I expected that both nodes will be stonithed simultaenously. On my test scenario, Node1 has ClusterIP resource. When I disconnect service/corosync link physically,