Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi Thomas, Hi, Am 04/25/2018 um 09:57 AM schrieb Jan Friesse: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): On 4/24/18 6:38 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right.

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi, Am 04/25/2018 um 09:57 AM schrieb Jan Friesse: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): On 4/24/18 6:38 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Honza, On 4/24/18 6:38 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is there and it's pretty easy to reproduce when

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Honza, On 4/24/18 6:38 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: >> On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>> Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: > I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is there and it's > pretty easy to reproduce when node with

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Thomas, Hi Honza On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is there and it's pretty easy to reproduce when node with lowest nodeid is paused. It's slightly harder

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi Honza On 4/6/18 10:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): >> Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: >>> I've tested it too and yes, you are 100% right. Bug is there and it's >>> pretty easy to reproduce when node with lowest nodeid is paused. It's >>> slightly harder

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi Thomas, Thomas Lamprecht napsal(a): Hi Honza, Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: Thomas, TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) active processors 3: 1 2 3 EXIT Finalize result is 1 (should be 1) Hope I did both test right, but as it reproduces multiple times with testcpg,

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi Honza, Am 03/09/2018 um 05:26 PM schrieb Jan Friesse: Thomas, TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) active processors 3: 1 2 3 EXIT Finalize  result is 1 (should be 1) Hope I did both test right, but as it reproduces multiple times with testcpg, our cpg usage in our filesystem, this seems

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 17:26 +0100, Jan Friesse wrote: > Thomas, > > > Hi, > > > > On 3/7/18 1:41 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: > > > Thomas, > > > > > > > First thanks for your answer! > > > > > > > > On 3/7/18 11:16 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > > ... > > > TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi, On 3/9/18 5:26 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: > ... > >> TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) >> active processors 3: 1 2 3 >> EXIT >> Finalize  result is 1 (should be 1) >> >> >> Hope I did both test right, but as it reproduces multiple times >> with testcpg, our cpg usage in our filesystem, this

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Thomas, Hi, On 3/7/18 1:41 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas, First thanks for your answer! On 3/7/18 11:16 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: ... TotemConfchgCallback: ringid (1.1436) active processors 3: 1 2 3 EXIT Finalize result is 1 (should be 1) Hope I did both test right, but as it

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Thomas, First thanks for your answer! On 3/7/18 11:16 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: Thomas, Hi, first some background info for my questions I'm going to ask: We use corosync as a basis for our distributed realtime configuration file system (pmxcfs)[1]. nice We got some reports of a

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

First thanks for your answer! On 3/7/18 11:16 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Thomas, > > >> Hi, >> >> first some background info for my questions I'm going to ask: >> We use corosync as a basis for our distributed realtime configuration >> file system (pmxcfs)[1]. > > nice > >> >> We got some

Re: [ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Thomas, Hi, first some background info for my questions I'm going to ask: We use corosync as a basis for our distributed realtime configuration file system (pmxcfs)[1]. nice We got some reports of a completely hanging FS with the only correlations being high load, often IO, and most

[ClusterLabs] corosync 2.4 CPG config change callback

Hi, first some background info for my questions I'm going to ask: We use corosync as a basis for our distributed realtime configuration file system (pmxcfs)[1]. We got some reports of a completely hanging FS with the only correlations being high load, often IO, and most times a message that