Re: [ClusterLabs] fencing configuration

2022-06-07 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 07.06.2022 11:50, Klaus Wenninger wrote: >> >> From the documentation is not clear to me whether this would be: >> a) multiple fencing where ipmi would be first level and sbd would be a >> second level fencing (where sbd always succeeds) >> b) or this is considered a single level fencing with

Re: [ClusterLabs] fencing configuration

2022-06-07 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 07.06.2022 11:26, Zoran Bošnjak wrote: > > In the test scenario, the dummy resource is currently running on node1. I > have simulated node failure by unplugging the ipmi AND host network > interfaces from node1. The result was that node1 gets rebooted (by watchdog), > but the rest of the

Re: [ClusterLabs] fencing configuration

2022-06-07 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:27 AM Zoran Bošnjak wrote: > > Hi, I need some help with correct fencing configuration in 5-node cluster. > > The speciffic issue is that there are 3 rooms, where in addition to node > failure scenario, each room can fail too (for example in case of room power >

[ClusterLabs] fencing configuration

2022-06-07 Thread Zoran Bošnjak
Hi, I need some help with correct fencing configuration in 5-node cluster. The speciffic issue is that there are 3 rooms, where in addition to node failure scenario, each room can fail too (for example in case of room power failure or room network failure). room0: [ node0 ] roomA: [ node1,