On 06/28/2017 05:29 PM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 09:20 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node
>> cluster.
>> E.g. here:
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-July/019228.html
>> In my eyes it
On 05/08/2017 09:20 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node
> cluster.
> E.g. here:
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-July/019228.html
> In my eyes it makes sense, so i try to establish that. I have two HP
On 2017-05-17 06:24, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
...
I'd like to know what the software is use is doing. Am i the only one having
that opinion ?
No.
How do you solve the problem of a deathmatch or killing the wrong node ?
*I* live dangerously with fencing disabled. But then my clusters only
On 05/17/2017 03:33 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> - On May 17, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Klaus Wenninger kwenn...@redhat.com wrote:
>
>
>>> I don't see that.
>> fence_* are the RHCS-style fence-agents coming mainly from
>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents.
>>
> Ah. Ok, i see that.
>
> Do you
- On May 17, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
> 08.05.2017 22:20, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node
>> cluster.
>> E.g. here:
>>
08.05.2017 22:20, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
Hi,
i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node cluster.
E.g. here: http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-July/019228.html
In my eyes it makes sense, so i try to establish that. I have two HP servers,
each with an
- On May 10, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
> On 05/10/2017 01:54 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 05/10/2017 12:26 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
>>> - fencing in 2-node clusters does not work reliably without fixed delay
>>
>> Not quite. Fixed delay allows a
On 05/10/2017 01:54 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 05/10/2017 12:26 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> - fencing in 2-node clusters does not work reliably without fixed delay
>
> Not quite. Fixed delay allows a particular method for avoiding a death
> match in a two-node cluster. Pacemaker's built-in
On 05/10/2017 12:26 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node
> cluster.
> ...
> But ... a random delay does not seem to
> be a reliable solution.
>
>> Some fence agents implement a delay parameter of their own, to set
i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node
cluster.
...
But ... a random delay does not seem to
be a reliable solution.
> Some fence agents implement a delay parameter of their own, to set a
> fixed delay. I believe that's what digimer uses.
Is
On 05/10/2017 12:20 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> "Lentes, Bernd" writes:
>
>> - On May 8, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Bernd Lentes
>> bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a
- On May 8, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Bernd Lentes
bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i remember that digimer often campaigns for a fence delay in a 2-node
> cluster.
> E.g. here:
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-July/019228.html
> In my eyes it makes
12 matches
Mail list logo