//www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
> *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
>
>
>
> --
>
> Da: Klaus Wenninger <kwenn...@redhat.com>
> A: users@clusterlabs.org
> Data: 5 settembre 2016 12.21.25 CEST
> O
--
Da: Klaus Wenninger
A: users@clusterlabs.org
Data: 5 settembre 2016 12.21.25 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour
On 09/05/2016 11:20 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
The dual machine is equipped with a syncro
nicle.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to
> open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org>
> Data: 1 settembre 2016 15.49.04 CEST
> Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour
>
> On 08/31/2016 11:50 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> > Thanks, go
clustering welcomed
Data: 1 settembre 2016 15.49.04 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour
On 08/31/2016 11:50 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Thanks, got it.
So, is it better to use "two_node: 1" or, as suggested else where, or
"no-quorum-policy=stop"?
I'd
: *http://www.gabrielebulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
> *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
>
>
>
> --------------
>
> Da: Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com>
>
om/cd/gabrielebulfon
--
Da: Ken Gaillot
A: users@clusterlabs.org
Data: 31 agosto 2016 17.25.05 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour
On 08/30/2016 01:52 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Sorry for reiterating, but my main question
-
>
>
> *Da:* Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com>
> *A:* kwenn...@redhat.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to
> open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org>
> *Data:* 29 agosto 2016 17.37.36 CEST
> *Oggetto:* Re: [ClusterLa
>
>
> *Da:* Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com>
> *A:* kwenn...@redhat.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to
> open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org>
> *Data:* 29 agosto 2016 17.37.36 CEST
> *Oggetto:* Re: [ClusterLabs] ip cluster
Bulfon
A:
kwenn...@redhat.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
welcomed
Data:
29 agosto 2016 17.37.36 CEST
Oggetto:
Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour
Ok, got it, I hadn't gracefully shut pacemaker on node2.
Now I restarted, everything was up, stopped pacemaker
--
Da: Klaus Wenninger
A: users@clusterlabs.org
Data: 29 agosto 2016 17.26.49 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour
On 08/29/2016 05:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi,
now that I have IPaddr work, I have a strange
On 08/29/2016 05:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now that I have IPaddr work, I have a strange behaviour on my test
> setup of 2 nodes, here is my configuration:
>
> ===STONITH/FENCING===
>
> primitive xstorage1-stonith stonith:external/ssh-sonicle op monitor
> interval="25" timeout="25"
Hi,
now that I have IPaddr work, I have a strange behaviour on my test setup of 2
nodes, here is my configuration:
===STONITH/FENCING===
primitive xstorage1-stonith stonith:external/ssh-sonicle op monitor
interval="25" timeout="25" start-delay="25" params hostlist="xstorage1"
primitive
12 matches
Mail list logo