Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-09-05 Thread Klaus Wenninger
//www.gabrielebulfon.com/> > *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon > > > > -- > > Da: Klaus Wenninger <kwenn...@redhat.com> > A: users@clusterlabs.org > Data: 5 settembre 2016 12.21.25 CEST > O

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-09-05 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
-- Da: Klaus Wenninger A: users@clusterlabs.org Data: 5 settembre 2016 12.21.25 CEST Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour On 09/05/2016 11:20 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: The dual machine is equipped with a syncro

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-09-05 Thread Klaus Wenninger
nicle.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to > open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> > Data: 1 settembre 2016 15.49.04 CEST > Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour > > On 08/31/2016 11:50 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > > Thanks, go

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-09-05 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
clustering welcomed Data: 1 settembre 2016 15.49.04 CEST Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour On 08/31/2016 11:50 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Thanks, got it. So, is it better to use "two_node: 1" or, as suggested else where, or "no-quorum-policy=stop"? I'd

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-09-01 Thread Klaus Wenninger
: *http://www.gabrielebulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/> > *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon > > > > -------------- > > Da: Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> >

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-31 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
om/cd/gabrielebulfon -- Da: Ken Gaillot A: users@clusterlabs.org Data: 31 agosto 2016 17.25.05 CEST Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour On 08/30/2016 01:52 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Sorry for reiterating, but my main question

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-31 Thread Ken Gaillot
- > > > *Da:* Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com> > *A:* kwenn...@redhat.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to > open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> > *Data:* 29 agosto 2016 17.37.36 CEST > *Oggetto:* Re: [ClusterLa

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-30 Thread Klaus Wenninger
> > > *Da:* Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com> > *A:* kwenn...@redhat.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to > open-source clustering welcomed <users@clusterlabs.org> > *Data:* 29 agosto 2016 17.37.36 CEST > *Oggetto:* Re: [ClusterLabs] ip cluster

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-30 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Bulfon A: kwenn...@redhat.com Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed Data: 29 agosto 2016 17.37.36 CEST Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour Ok, got it, I hadn't gracefully shut pacemaker on node2. Now I restarted, everything was up, stopped pacemaker

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-29 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
-- Da: Klaus Wenninger A: users@clusterlabs.org Data: 29 agosto 2016 17.26.49 CEST Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour On 08/29/2016 05:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Hi, now that I have IPaddr work, I have a strange

Re: [ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-29 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 08/29/2016 05:18 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Hi, > > now that I have IPaddr work, I have a strange behaviour on my test > setup of 2 nodes, here is my configuration: > > ===STONITH/FENCING=== > > primitive xstorage1-stonith stonith:external/ssh-sonicle op monitor > interval="25" timeout="25"

[ClusterLabs] ip clustering strange behaviour

2016-08-29 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hi, now that I have IPaddr work, I have a strange behaviour on my test setup of 2 nodes, here is my configuration: ===STONITH/FENCING=== primitive xstorage1-stonith stonith:external/ssh-sonicle op monitor interval="25" timeout="25" start-delay="25" params hostlist="xstorage1" primitive