subject:"\[ClusterLabs\] no clone for pcs\-based cluster fencing\?"

Re: [ClusterLabs] no clone for pcs-based cluster fencing?

2016-03-21 Thread Devin Reade

--On Monday, March 21, 2016 09:22:40 AM -0500 Ken Gaillot wrote: It's actually newer pacemaker versions rather than pcs itself. Fence agents do not need to be cloned, or even running -- as long as they're configured and enabled, any node can use the resource. Excellent.

Re: [ClusterLabs] no clone for pcs-based cluster fencing?

2016-03-21 Thread Ken Gaillot

On 03/20/2016 06:20 PM, Devin Reade wrote: > I'm looking at a new pcs-style two node cluster running on CentOS 7 > (pacemaker 1.1.13, corosync 2.3.4) and crm_mon shows this line > for my fencing resource, that is the resource running on only one of > the two nodes: > >fence_cl2