On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 23:43 +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 11.12.2017 23:06, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> [...]
> > > =
> > >
> > > * The first issue I found (and I expect that to be a reason for
> > > some
> > > other issues) is that
> > > pacemaker_remote does not drop an old crmds' connection
11.12.2017 23:06, Ken Gaillot wrote:
[...]
=
* The first issue I found (and I expect that to be a reason for some
other issues) is that
pacemaker_remote does not drop an old crmds' connection after new
crmd connects.
As IPC proxy connections are in the hash table, there is a 50% chance
that
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 12:46 +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as 1.1.17 received a lot of care in pcmk_remote, I decided to try it
> again
> in rather big setup (less then previous, so I'm not hit by IPC
> disconnects here).
>
> From the first runs there are still some severe issues
Hi,
as 1.1.17 received a lot of care in pcmk_remote, I decided to try it again
in rather big setup (less then previous, so I'm not hit by IPC disconnects
here).
>From the first runs there are still some severe issues when cluster nodes are
>fenced.
The following results are obtained by
