Re: [ClusterLabs] question about equal resource distribution

Ilia Sokolinski writes: > Suppose I have a N node cluster where N > 2 running m*N resources. Resources > don’t have preferred nodes, but since resources take RAM and CPU it is > important to distribute them equally among the nodes. > Will pacemaker do the equal

Re: [ClusterLabs] question about equal resource distribution

Ilia Sokolinski writes: > Thank you! > > What quantity does pacemaker tries to equalize - number of running resources > per node or total stickiness per node? > I honestly don't know exactly what the criteria are. Without any utilization definitions for nodes, I *think*

Re: [ClusterLabs] question about equal resource distribution

On 02/17/2017 08:43 AM, Ilia Sokolinski wrote: > Thank you! > > What quantity does pacemaker tries to equalize - number of running resources > per node or total stickiness per node? > > Suppose I have a bunch of web server groups each with IPaddr and apache > resources, and a fewer number of

Re: [ClusterLabs] question about equal resource distribution

Thank you! What quantity does pacemaker tries to equalize - number of running resources per node or total stickiness per node? Suppose I have a bunch of web server groups each with IPaddr and apache resources, and a fewer number of database groups each with IPaddr, postgres and LVM resources.

[ClusterLabs] question about equal resource distribution

Suppose I have a N node cluster where N > 2 running m*N resources. Resources don’t have preferred nodes, but since resources take RAM and CPU it is important to distribute them equally among the nodes. Will pacemaker do the equal distribution, e.g. m resources per node? If a node fails, will