On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:16 PM Gerald Vogt wrote:
>
> On 02.03.23 13:51, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> > Now if I stop pacemaker on one of those nodes, e.g. on node ha2, it's
> > fine. ip2 will be moved immediately to ha3. Good.
> >
> > However, if pacemaker on ha2 starts up again, it will
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 08:41 +0100, Gerald Vogt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am setting up a mail relay cluster which main purpose is to
> maintain
> the service ips via IPaddr2 and move them between cluster nodes when
> necessary.
>
> The service ips should only be active on nodes which are running all
On 02.03.23 13:51, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
Now if I stop pacemaker on one of those nodes, e.g. on node ha2, it's
fine. ip2 will be moved immediately to ha3. Good.
However, if pacemaker on ha2 starts up again, it will immediately
remove
ip2 from ha3 and keep it offline, while
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 8:41 AM Gerald Vogt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am setting up a mail relay cluster which main purpose is to maintain
> the service ips via IPaddr2 and move them between cluster nodes when
> necessary.
>
> The service ips should only be active on nodes which are running all
>
Hi,
I am setting up a mail relay cluster which main purpose is to maintain
the service ips via IPaddr2 and move them between cluster nodes when
necessary.
The service ips should only be active on nodes which are running all
necessary mail (systemd) services.
So I have set up a resource
