Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

Hi Ken, thank you for your comment. i think this case can be closed, i use your suggestion of constraint and then problem resolved. thanks a lot~~ On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 05/03/2017 09:04 PM, Albert Weng wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

On 05/03/2017 09:04 PM, Albert Weng wrote: > Hi Marek, > > Thanks your reply. > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Marek Grac > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Albert Weng

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

Hi Marek, thanks for your quickly responding. According to you opinion, when i type "pcs status" then i saw the following result of fence : ipmi-fence-node1(stonith:fence_ipmilan):Started cluaterb ipmi-fence-node2(stonith:fence_ipmilan):Started clusterb Does it means both ipmi

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

Hi, On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Albert Weng wrote: > Hi All, > > I have created active/passive pacemaker cluster on RHEL 7. > > here is my environment: > clustera : 192.168.11.1 > clusterb : 192.168.11.2 > clustera-ilo4 : 192.168.11.10 > clusterb-ilo4 :

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

Hi All, the following logs from corosync.log that might help. Apr 25 10:29:32 [15334] gmlcdbw02pengine: info: native_print: ipmi-fence-db01(stonith:fence_ipmilan):Started gmlcdbw01 Apr 25 10:29:32 [15334] gmlcdbw02pengine: info: native_print: ipmi-fence-db02

[ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

Hi All, I have created active/passive pacemaker cluster on RHEL 7. here is my environment: clustera : 192.168.11.1 clusterb : 192.168.11.2 clustera-ilo4 : 192.168.11.10 clusterb-ilo4 : 192.168.11.11 both nodes are connected SAN storage for shared storage. i used the following cmd to create my