Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-05 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 10/05/2016 11:56 AM, Israel Brewster wrote: >> On Oct 4, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Digimer > > wrote: >> >> On 04/10/16 07:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: >>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Digimer >> > wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-05 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 10/05/2016 12:19 PM, Digimer wrote: > Explain why this is a bad idea, because I don't see anything wrong with it. My point exactly. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-05 Thread Digimer
On 05/10/16 01:14 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 10/05/2016 11:56 AM, Israel Brewster wrote: > >> As you say, though, this is something I'll simply need to get over if I want >> real HA > > The sad truth is making simple stupid stuff that Just Works(tm) is not > cool. Making stuff that will run

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Digimer
On 04/10/16 07:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: > On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Digimer wrote: >> >> On 04/10/16 07:09 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: >>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Digimer wrote: On 04/10/16 06:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: > On Oct 4,

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Israel Brewster
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Digimer wrote: > > On 04/10/16 07:09 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: >> On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Digimer wrote: >>> >>> On 04/10/16 06:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Digimer
On 04/10/16 07:09 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: > On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Digimer wrote: >> >> On 04/10/16 06:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: >>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot >> > wrote: On 10/04/2016 11:31

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Digimer
On 04/10/16 06:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote: > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot > wrote: >> >> On 10/04/2016 11:31 AM, Israel Brewster wrote: >>> I sent this a week ago, but never got a response, so I'm sending it >>> again in the hopes

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Israel Brewster
On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On 10/04/2016 11:31 AM, Israel Brewster wrote: >> I sent this a week ago, but never got a response, so I'm sending it >> again in the hopes that it just slipped through the cracks. It seems to >> me that this should just be

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 10/04/2016 11:31 AM, Israel Brewster wrote: > I sent this a week ago, but never got a response, so I'm sending it > again in the hopes that it just slipped through the cracks. It seems to > me that this should just be a simple mis-configuration on my part > causing the issue, but I suppose it

[ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-10-04 Thread Israel Brewster
I sent this a week ago, but never got a response, so I'm sending it again in the hopes that it just slipped through the cracks. It seems to me that this should just be a simple mis-configuration on my part causing the issue, but I suppose it could be a bug as well.I have two two-node clusters set

[ClusterLabs] stonithd/fenced filling up logs

2016-09-27 Thread Israel Brewster
I have two two-node clusters set up using corosync/pacemaker on CentOS 6.8. One cluster is simply sharing an IP, while the other one has numerous services and IP's set up between the two machines in the cluster. Both appear to be working fine. However, I was poking around today, and I noticed that