[ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-27 Thread Hui Xiang
Thanks guys, very appreciated. Jan Pokorný napsal(a): >* [Hui, no need to address us individually along with the list, we are *>* both subscribed to it since around the beginning] *>>* On 26/06/17 16:10 +0800, Hui Xiang wrote: *>>* Thanks guys!! ** @Ken *>>* I did "ifconfig ethx down" to

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-26 Thread Jan Friesse
Jan Pokorný napsal(a): [Hui, no need to address us individually along with the list, we are both subscribed to it since around the beginning] On 26/06/17 16:10 +0800, Hui Xiang wrote: Thanks guys!! @Ken I did "ifconfig ethx down" to make the cluster interface down. That's what I suspected

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-26 Thread Jan Pokorný
[Hui, no need to address us individually along with the list, we are both subscribed to it since around the beginning] On 26/06/17 16:10 +0800, Hui Xiang wrote: > Thanks guys!! > > @Ken > I did "ifconfig ethx down" to make the cluster interface down. That's what I suspected and what I tried to

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 06/23/2017 11:52 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 06/23/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > >> People using ifdown or the iproute-based equivalent seem far >> too prevalent, even if for long time bystanders the idea looks >> continually disproved ad nauseam. > > Has anyone had a network card

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 06/23/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > People using ifdown or the iproute-based equivalent seem far > too prevalent, even if for long time bystanders the idea looks > continually disproved ad nauseam. Has anyone had a network card fail recently and what does that look like on modern

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 23/06/17 08:48 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 06/22/2017 09:44 PM, Hui Xiang wrote: >> I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an >> vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the >> management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still

Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 06/22/2017 09:44 PM, Hui Xiang wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an > vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the > management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still have > connectivity to public or

[ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost connection with the other two nodes

2017-06-22 Thread Hui Xiang
Hi guys, I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still have connectivity to public or non-management network, I was expecting that the vip