-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Jan,
I know that increasing the complexity reduces the
availability of a service, so it is no surprise to me
that it is frowned upon running services, which
should be highgly available, on virtual machines.
However, services are regularely
hi,
I've built a recent cluster stack from sources on Debian Jessie and I can't
get rid of cpu spikes. Corosync blocks the entire system for seconds on
every simple transition, even itself:
drbdtest1 corosync[4734]: [MAIN ] Corosync main process was not
scheduled for 2590.4512 ms (threshold
Hi.
this is my pcs status
Online: [ node1 node2 ]
Full list of resources:
WebSite(ocf::heartbeat:apache):Started node1
Failed actions:
WebSite_start_0 on node2 'unknown error' (1): call=28, status=complete,
last-rc-change='Wed Aug 5 08:26:47 2015', queued=0ms, exec=3158ms
Cluster name: pacemaker1
Last updated: Wed Aug 5 09:07:27 2015
Last change: Wed Aug 5 08:58:24 2015
Stack: cman
Current DC: node1 - partition with quorum
Version: 1.1.11-97629de
2 Nodes configured
2 Resources configured
Online: [ node1 node2 ]
Full list of resources:
ClusterIP
Andrei Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com schrieb am 05.08.2015 um 09:07 in
Nachricht
caa91j0xsx3u6xnexjts1u9pcwpovrqwjhodqpvmsexonudb...@mail.gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Vijay Partha vijaysarath...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 doubts.
1.) If i disable a resource and reboot the
On 08/05/2015 04:05 AM, Vijay Partha wrote:
Hi,
I need to run apache service on both the nodes in a cluster. httpd is
listening in port 80 on first node and httpd is listening to port 81 on the
second. I am not able to add these instances separately rather both of them
are starting on the
FYI to anyone running the legacy plugin or heartbeat as pacemaker's
communication layer:
Use-after-free memory issues can cause segfault crashes in the cib when
using pacemaker 1.1.13 with the legacy plugin. Heartbeat is likely to be
affected as well.
Clusters using CMAN or corosync 2 as the
On 05/08/15 03:09 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 02/08/15 16:30 +0200, Noel Kuntze wrote:
I would like to know if it is possible for
fence-virtd to realy a request from a client, which it
received via serial, VM channel or TCP connection
from an agent to another daemon, if the VM that should
be
Ok, I’ll look into it. Thanks for retesting.
On 5 Aug 2015, at 4:00 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Do you know if this behaviour still exists?
A LOT of work went into the remote node logic in the last couple of months,
its
possible this was fixed as a side-effect.
