Hi,
Pacemaker Explained discusses in 13.3 the special treatment of STONITH
resources. Now, I configured 6 fence_ipmilan instances in a cluster
which runs on 4 nodes currently. No STONITH resource started on the
node it can kill, even though I haven't configured location constraints
yet. Is
On 19/10/15 06:53 AM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running a 2 node cluster with this config on centos 6.5/6.6 where
It's important to keep both nodes on the same minor version,
particularly in this case. Please either upgrade centos 6.5 to 6.6 or
both to 6.7.
> i have a multi-state
On 10/19/2015 11:42 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 19/10/15 12:34 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> Pacemaker supports fencing "topologies", allowing multiple fencing
>> devices to be used (in conjunction or as fallbacks) when a node needs to
>> be fenced.
>>
>> However, there is a catch when using something
Pacemaker supports fencing "topologies", allowing multiple fencing
devices to be used (in conjunction or as fallbacks) when a node needs to
be fenced.
However, there is a catch when using something like redundant power
supplies. If you put two power switches in the same topology level, and
Hi,
The http://www.ultrabug.fr/tuning-pacemaker-for-large-clusters/ blog
post states that "Pacemaker v1.1.11 should come with a feature which
will allow the IPC layer to adjust the PCMK_ipc_buffer automagically".
However, I failed to identify this in the ChangeLog. Did it really
happen, can I
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:25:29PM +0200, users-requ...@clusterlabs.org wrote:
> From: Russell Martin
> Subject: [ClusterLabs] Corosync & pacemaker quit between boot and login
>
> ...
> Both corosync and pacemaker seem to start fine during boot (they both say
> "[OK]")