Hi Hideo-san,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:41:26AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
> Hi All,
>
> How about the patch which I contributed by a former email?
> I would like an opinion.
It somehow slipped.
I suppose that you tested the patch well and nobody objected so
far, so
On 10/30/2015 05:14 AM, Karthikeyan Ramasamy wrote:
> Hello,
> We are using Pacemaker to manage the services that run on a node, as part
> of a service management framework, and manage the nodes running the services
> as a cluster. One service will be running as 1+1 and other services with be
On 10/30/2015 05:29 AM, Karthikeyan Ramasamy wrote:
> Dear Pacemaker support,
> We are using pacemaker1.1.10-14 to implement a service management framework,
> with high availability on the road-map. This pacemaker version was available
> through redhat for our environments
>
> We are running
On 10/29/2015 12:42 PM, Pritam Kharat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have single node with 5 resources running on it. When I rebooted node
> sometimes I saw resources in stopped state though node comes online.
>
> When looked in to the logs, one difference found in success and failure
> case is, when
>
Hello,
We are using Pacemaker to manage the services that run on a node, as part of
a service management framework, and manage the nodes running the services as a
cluster. One service will be running as 1+1 and other services with be N+1.
During our testing, we see that the pacemaker
Thanks, Mr.Gaillot.
Yes, we trigger the snmp notification with an external script. From your
response, I understand that the issue wouldn't occur with 1.1.14, as it
wouldn't require the crm_mon process. Is this understanding correct?
We have been given 1.1.10 as the supported version from
On 29/10/15 14:10 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 29/10/15 15:27 +0530, Pritam Kharat wrote:
>> When I ran ocf-tester to test IPaddr2 agent
>>
>> ocf-tester -n sc_vip -o ip=192.168.20.188 -o cidr_netmask=24 -o nic=eth0
>> /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/IPaddr2
>>
>> I got this error - ERROR:
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for a reply.
> It somehow slipped.
>
> I suppose that you tested the patch well and nobody objected so
> far, so lets apply it.
>
> Many thanks! And sorry about the delay.
I confirmed the merge of the patch.
* http://hg.linux-ha.org/glue/rev/56f40ec5d37e
Many Thanks!
Dear Pacemaker support,
We are using pacemaker1.1.10-14 to implement a service management framework,
with high availability on the road-map. This pacemaker version was available
through redhat for our environments
We are running into an issue where pacemaker causes a node to crash. The
