Re: [ClusterLabs] பதில்: Re: crm_mon memory leak

2015-11-02 Thread Karthikeyan Ramasamy
Yes, Ken. There were multiple instances of the external script also running. What do you think could possibly be wrong with the script that triggers the crm_mon process everytime? We are on RHEL 6.5. I am not sure what's the plan for RHEL 6.7 and 7.1. Thanks, Karthik. -Original

Re: [ClusterLabs] பதில்: Re: crm_mon memory leak

2015-11-02 Thread Karthikeyan Ramasamy
Many thanks. Will check and get back. -Original Message- From: Ken Gaillot [mailto:kgail...@redhat.com] Sent: 02 நவம்பர் 2015 21:21 To: Karthikeyan Ramasamy; users@clusterlabs.org Subject: Re: பதில்: Re: [ClusterLabs] crm_mon memory leak On 11/02/2015 09:39 AM, Karthikeyan Ramasamy

Re: [ClusterLabs] பதில்: Re: crm_mon memory leak

2015-11-02 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 11/02/2015 09:39 AM, Karthikeyan Ramasamy wrote: > Yes, Ken. There were multiple instances of the external script also running. > What do you think could possibly be wrong with the script that triggers the > crm_mon process everytime? It's the other way around, crm_mon spawns the script.

Re: [ClusterLabs] பதில்: Re: crm_mon memory leak

2015-11-02 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 10/31/2015 12:38 AM, Karthikeyan Ramasamy wrote: > Thanks, Mr.Gaillot. > > Yes, we trigger the snmp notification with an external script. From your > response, I understand that the issue wouldn't occur with 1.1.14, as it > wouldn't require the crm_mon process. Is this understanding

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker process 10-15% CPU

2015-11-02 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 11/01/2015 03:43 AM, Karthikeyan Ramasamy wrote: > Thanks, Ken. > > I understand about stonith. We are introducing pacemaker for an existing > product not for a new product. Currently, client-side is responsible for > load-balancing. > > High-availability for our product is the next

[ClusterLabs] Multiple OpenSIPS services on one cluster

2015-11-02 Thread Nuno Pereira
Hi all. We have one cluster that has 9 nodes and 20 resources. Four of those hosts are PSIP-SRV01-active, PSIP-SRV01-passive, PSIP-SRV02-active and PSIP-SRV02-active. They should provide an lsb:opensips service, 2 by 2: . The SRV01-opensips and SRV01-IP resources should be active