Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: design of a two-node cluster

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 08.12.2015 um 09:01 in > Nachricht > : >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ulrich

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: design of a two-node cluster

>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 08.12.2015 >>> um 09:13 in Nachricht <00a901d13190$5c6db3c0$15491b40$@helmholtz-muenchen.de>: > Digimer wrote: > >> >>> Should I install all vm's in one partition or every vm in a seperate >> >>> partition ? The advantage of one

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: design of a two-node cluster

Ulrich wrote: > > > > Hi Ulrich, > > > > the migration i meant is the transition from my current setup (virtual > > machines in raw files in a partition with filesystem) to the one > > anticipated in the cluster (virtual machines in blank logical volumes > > without fs). How can I do that ? And

Re: [ClusterLabs] design of a two-node cluster

Check something like [community version] ProxMox great way to administer your KVMs /Steffen > On 7. dec. 2015, at 18.35, Lentes, Bernd > wrote: > > Hi, > > i've been asking all around here a while ago. Unfortunately I couldn't >

Re: [ClusterLabs] design of a two-node cluster

On 08/12/15 03:13 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Digimer wrote: > > Should I install all vm's in one partition or every vm in a seperate > partition ? The advantage of one vm per partition is that I don't > need a cluster fs, right ? I would put each VM on a dedicated LV and not

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: design of a two-node cluster

On 08/12/15 08:35 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 08.12.2015 um > 13:10 in Nachricht <012101d131b1$5ec1b2e0$1c4518a0$@helmholtz-muenchen.de>: >> Ulrich wrote: >> >>> >> "Lentes, Bernd"

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources suddenly get target-role="stopped"

Mistery solved: Never put: [ "${2}" = release ] && crm resource stop VMA_${1} inside /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu Very wrong decision. On Monday 07 December 2015 16:49:01 emmanuel segura wrote: > the next time show your full config unless your config have something > special that you can't show. >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: design of a two-node cluster

On 08/12/15 02:44 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Digimer schrieb am 07.12.2015 um 22:40 in Nachricht > <5665fcdc.1030...@alteeve.ca>: > [...] >> Node 1 looks up how to fence node 2, sees no delay and fences >> immediately. Node 2 looks up how to fence node 1, sees a delay and >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] How I can contribute the code and TR fix for default resouce agent?

On 12/07/2015 01:13 PM, Xiaohua Wang wrote: > Hi Friends, > Since our product is using the Pacemaker and related Resource Agent based on > RHEL 6.5. > We found some bugs and already fixed them. So we want to contribute the code > fixing? > How can we do it ? > > Best Regards > Xiaohua Wang Hi,

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker 1.1.14 - Release Candidate (try it out!)

The release cycle for Pacemaker 1.1.14 has begun! The source code for a release candidate is available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.14-rc2 This release candidate introduces some valuable new features: * Resources will now start as soon as their state

[ClusterLabs] FW: [Pacemaker] remove duplicate node

Hi How would I remove a duplicate node, I have a 2 node setup , but on node is showing twice . crm show configure below, node gat-voip-01 is listed twice. node $id="0dc85a64-01ad-4fc5-81fd-698208a8322c" gat-voip-02\ attributes standby="on" node