Re: [ClusterLabs] Early VM resource migration

2015-12-17 Thread Klechomir
Hi Ken, I've tried with and without colocation. The rule was: colocation bla2 inf: VM_VM1 AA_Filesystem_CDrive1 In both cases the VM_VM1 tries to live migrate back the coming after standby node while cloned AA_Filesystem_CDrive1 isn't up on it yet. Same result with pacemaker 1.14-rc2 Regards,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Early VM resource migration

2015-12-17 Thread Klechomir
Hi Ulrich, This is only a part of the config, which concerns the problem. Even with dummy resources, the behaviour will be identical, so don't think that dlm/clvmd res. config will help solving the problem. Regards, KIecho On 17.12.2015 08:19:43 Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Klechomir

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Early VM resource migration

2015-12-17 Thread Klechomir
Here is what pacemaker says right after node1 comes back after standby: Dec 16 16:11:41 [4512] CLUSTER-2pengine:debug: native_assign_node: All nodes for resource VM_VM1 are unavailable, unclean or shutting down (CLUSTER-1: 1, -100) Dec 16 16:11:41 [4512] CLUSTER-2pengine:

[ClusterLabs] successful ipmi stonith still times out

2015-12-17 Thread Ron Kerry
I have a customer (running SLE 11 SP4 HAE) who is seeing the following stonith behavior running the ipmi stonith plugin. Dec 15 14:21:43 test4 pengine[24002]: warning: pe_fence_node: Node test3 will be fenced because termination was requested Dec 15 14:21:43 test4 pengine[24002]: warning:

Re: [ClusterLabs] successful ipmi stonith still times out

2015-12-17 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 12/17/2015 10:32 AM, Ron Kerry wrote: > I have a customer (running SLE 11 SP4 HAE) who is seeing the following > stonith behavior running the ipmi stonith plugin. > > Dec 15 14:21:43 test4 pengine[24002]: warning: pe_fence_node: Node > test3 will be fenced because termination was requested >