Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker (remote) component relations

On 02/08/2016 07:55 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for information about the component interdependencies, > because I'd like to split the Pacemaker packages in Debian properly. > The current idea is to create two daemon packages, pacemaker and > pacemaker-remote, which exclude

Re: [ClusterLabs] Hawk release 2.0

On 02/08/2016 11:30 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > It is my great pleasure to announce that Hawk 2.0.0 is released! Hi Krostoffer, Thanks for the announcement. It looks good! Will this make it into SLES 12? Thanks, Jorge ___ Users mailing list:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Hawk release 2.0

Jorge Fábregas writes: > On 02/08/2016 11:30 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: >> It is my great pleasure to announce that Hawk 2.0.0 is released! > > Hi Krostoffer, > > Thanks for the announcement. It looks good! > > Will this make it into SLES 12? > Hi, and thank you!

[ClusterLabs] Working with 2 VIPs

Hello, I'm not sure if this mailign is the proper place to send ma request, please tell me where i should send it if not :) I have an use case that i can't run acutally with corosync + pacemaker. I have two nodes, two VIP and two services (one dupplicated), in order to provide an

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two bugs in fence_ec2 script

Do you know where fence_ec2 is officially revision controlled? Is there an "official" release maintained anywhere? I've found a number of different versions online, but I haven't been able to find any that claim to be the repository for debugging and development. Thanks for any guidance you can

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two bugs in fence_ec2 script

Marek marx Grác writes: > Hi, > > fence_ec2 is not part of official upstream > (https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents/) yet. There are various issues > that blocks it, see archive if you are interested.  > > Anyway thanks for patch and I hope people will find it there.

Re: [ClusterLabs] Two bugs in fence_ec2 script

Hi, fence_ec2 is not part of official upstream (https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents/) yet. There are various issues that blocks it, see archive if you are interested.  Anyway thanks for patch and I hope people will find it there. m, On 5 February 2016 at 16:11:02, Steve Marshall

[ClusterLabs] crmsh configure delete for constraints

Hi, when performing a delete operation, crmsh (2.2.0) having -F tries to stop passed op arguments and then waits for DC to become idle. That is not needed if only constraints are passed to delete. Could that be changed? Or, could it wait only if there is something to stop? Something like this:

Re: [ClusterLabs] crmsh configure delete for constraints

Vladislav Bogdanov writes: > Hi, > > when performing a delete operation, crmsh (2.2.0) having -F tries > to stop passed op arguments and then waits for DC to become idle. > > That is not needed if only constraints are passed to delete. > Could that be changed? Or, could it

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM fencing

On 08/02/16 03:55 PM, G Spot wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Am trying to create shared storage with clvm/gfs2 and when I try to > fence I only see scsi option but my storage is conencted through FC is > there any otherways can I fence my 1G stonith device other than scsi? fencing of a lost node with