Hi all,
next question: I'm on centos 7 and there's no more /etc/init.d/. With lennartware spreading, is there a coherent plan to deal
with former LSB agents?
Specifically, should I roll my own RA for dovecot or is there one in the
works somewhere?
TIA,
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> > Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> >> Andrew
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > Adam Spiers wrote:
>> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam
"Lentes, Bernd" writes:
> - On Jun 7, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu wrote:
>
>> "Lentes, Bernd" writes:
>>
>>> Ok. Does DLM takes care that a LV just can be used on one host ?
>>
>> No. Even plain LVM
- On Jun 7, 2016, at 5:54 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
> DLM is just a distributed lock manager, that's it. LVM uses it to
> coordinate actions within the cluster, so what LVM does is still up to LVM.
>
> I'm not a dev, so I might get this a little wrong, but basically it
> works
On 07/06/16 07:23 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>>> Ok. Does DLM takes care that a LV just can be used on one host ?
>>> cLVM just takes care that the naming is the same on all nodes, right ?
>>
>> AFAIK DLM takes care about the LVM Locking cluster wide.
>
> What does that mean concretely, "LVM
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot
"Lentes, Bernd" writes:
> Ok. Does DLM takes care that a LV just can be used on one host ?
No. Even plain LVM uses locks to serialize access to its metadata
(avoid concurrent writes corrupting it). These locks are provided by
the host kernel
- On Jun 7, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Sven Moeller smoel...@nichthelfer.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am Dienstag, 07. Juni 2016 11:42 CEST, "Lentes, Bernd"
> schrieb:
>
>>
>>
>> - On Jun 6, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ok.
Hi all,
I am happy to announce the 3.1.9 release of gfs2-utils. This release
includes the following notable changes:
* fsck.gfs2 now uses less memory
* Improvements and fixes to fsck.gfs2's xattr and resource group checking
* mkfs.gfs2 reports progress so that you can tell it's still
10 matches
Mail list logo