Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:37:39 -0600 Ken Gaillot wrote: ... > > All RA > > must implement the first two states "stopped" and "started". The > > cases where RA > > is promotable should then be called..."promotable" I suppose. > > > > However, why exactly should we find a

Re: [ClusterLabs] One volume is trimmable but the other is not?

On 01/26/2018 07:45 PM, Eric Robinson wrote: >>> I sent this to the drbd list too, but it’s possible that someone here >>> may know. >>> >>> >>> >>> This is a WEIRD one. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why would one drbd volume be trimmable and the other one not? >>> >> iirc drbd stores some of the config in the

Re: [ClusterLabs] One volume is trimmable but the other is not?

> > I sent this to the drbd list too, but it’s possible that someone here > > may know. > > > > > > > > This is a WEIRD one. > > > > > > > > Why would one drbd volume be trimmable and the other one not? > > > > iirc drbd stores some of the config in the meta-data as well - like e.g. some >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On 2018-01-26 03:52 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: >> "Promotable" is certainly accurate, but I have a (very mild) concern >> about how easily it is understood by non-native English speakers. >> Perhaps someone who speaks English as a second language could chime in >> on that? > I would probably fall

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On 01/26/2018 04:37 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:07 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:21:30 -0500 >> Digimer wrote: >> >>> On 2018-01-25 01:28 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 13:06 -0500, Digimer wrote:  

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:07 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:21:30 -0500 > Digimer wrote: > > > On 2018-01-25 01:28 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 13:06 -0500, Digimer wrote:   > > > > On 2018-01-25 11:11 AM, Ken Gaillot

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:41:51 +0300 Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 25.01.2018 21:28, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > [...] > > >> If I can throw another suggestion in (without offering preference for > >> it > >> myself), 'dual-state clones'? The reasoning is that, though three > >>

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

25.01.2018 21:28, Ken Gaillot wrote: [...] If I can throw another suggestion in (without offering preference for it myself), 'dual-state clones'? The reasoning is that, though three words instead of two, spell-check likes it, it sounds OK on day one (from a language perspective) and it

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On 01/25/2018 09:21 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 2018-01-25 01:28 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 13:06 -0500, Digimer wrote: >>> On 2018-01-25 11:11 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:58 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:28:03

Re: [ClusterLabs] One volume is trimmable but the other is not?

On 01/25/2018 11:45 PM, Eric Robinson wrote: > > I sent this to the drbd list too, but it’s possible that someone here > may know. > >   > > This is a WEIRD one. > >   > > Why would one drbd volume be trimmable and the other one not? > iirc drbd stores some of the config in the meta-data as well

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:21:30 -0500 Digimer wrote: > On 2018-01-25 01:28 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 13:06 -0500, Digimer wrote: > >> On 2018-01-25 11:11 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:58 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > >>>