the start function, need to start the resource when monitor doesn't return
success
2018-04-12 23:38 GMT+02:00 Bishoy Mikhael :
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to create a resource agent to promote a standby HDFS namenode
> to active when the virtual IP failover to another node.
>
I’m trying to implement a HA solution which recovers very quickly when a
node fails. It my configuration, when I reboot a node, I see in the logs
that pacemaker realizes the node is down, and decides to move all resources
to the surviving node. To do this, it initiates a ‘stop’ operation on each
Hi All,
I'm trying to create a resource agent to promote a standby HDFS namenode to
active when the virtual IP failover to another node.
I've taken the skeleton from the Dummy OCF agent.
The modifications I've done to the Dummy agent are as follows:
HDFSHA_start() {
HDFSHA_monitor
if [
Jan Pokorný writes:
> On 12/04/18 14:33 +0200, Jan Friesse wrote:
>
>> This release contains a lot of fixes, including fix for
>> CVE-2018-1084.
>
> Security related updates would preferably provide more context
Absolutely, thanks for providing that! Looking at the git
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 07:29 +, 范国腾 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use the following command to create the cluster. Node2 is always
> the master when the cluster starts. Why does pacemaker not select
> node1 as the default master?
> How to configure if we want node1 to be the default master?
You can
On 12/04/18 14:33 +0200, Jan Friesse wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the latest maintenance release of Corosync
> 2.4.4 available immediately from our website at
> http://build.clusterlabs.org/corosync/releases/.
>
> This release contains a lot of fixes, including fix for CVE-2018-1084.
I am pleased to announce the latest maintenance release of Corosync
2.4.4 available immediately from our website at
http://build.clusterlabs.org/corosync/releases/.
This release contains a lot of fixes, including fix for CVE-2018-1084.
Complete changelog for 2.4.4:
Andrey Ter-Zakhariants (1):
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:31:39 +
范国腾 wrote:
> Thank you very much for help check this issue. The information is in the
> attachment.
>
> I have restarted the cluster after I send my first email. Not sure if it
> affects the checking of "the result of "crm_simulate
On 04/12/2018 04:37 AM, David Hunt wrote:
> Thanks Guys,
>
> Ideally I would like to have event driven (rather than slower polled)
> inputs into pacemaker to quickly trigger the fall over. I assume
> adding event driven inputs to pacemaker isn't straightforward? If it
> was possible to add event
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 03:14:52 +
范国腾 wrote:
> We have three nodes in the cluster. When the master postgres resource in one
> node(db1) crashed and could not start any more, we hope that one of the slave
> node(db2,db3) could be promoted be master. But it does not.
>
Hello,
We use the following command to create the cluster. Node2 is always the master
when the cluster starts. Why does pacemaker not select node1 as the default
master?
How to configure if we want node1 to be the default master?
pcs cluster setup --name cluster_pgsql node1 node2
pcs resource
11 matches
Mail list logo