Re: [ClusterLabs] Why Won't Resources Move?

2018-08-01 Thread Eric Robinson
> > The message likely came from the resource agent calling crm_attribute > > to set a node attribute. That message usually means the cluster isn't > > running on that node, so it's highly suspect. The cib might have > > crashed, which should be in the log as well. I'd look into that first. > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Why Won't Resources Move?

2018-08-01 Thread Eric Robinson
> -Original Message- > From: Users [mailto:users-boun...@clusterlabs.org] On Behalf Of Ken Gaillot > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 2:17 PM > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed > > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Why Won't Resources Move? > > On Wed,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Why Won't Resources Move?

2018-08-01 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 03:49 +, Eric Robinson wrote: > I have what seems to be a healthy cluster, but I can’t get resources > to move. >   > Here’s what’s installed… >   > [root@001db01a cluster]# yum list installed|egrep "pacem|coro" > corosync.x86_64  2.4.3-2.el7_5.1   

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fence agent executing thousands of API calls per hour

2018-08-01 Thread Emmanuel Gelati
Maybe you need to use pcs resource update 2018-08-01 22:26 GMT+02:00 Casey & Gina : > How is the interval adjusted? Based on an example I found online, I > thought `pcs resource op monitor interval=15m vmware_fence` should work, > but after executing that `pcs config` still shows a monitor

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fence agent executing thousands of API calls per hour

2018-08-01 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 14:47 -0600, Casey & Gina wrote: > Actually, is it even necessary at all?  Based on my other E-mail to > the list (Fence agent ends up stopped with no clear reason why), it > seems that sometimes the monitor fails with an "unknown error", > resulting in a cluster that won't

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fence agent ends up stopped with no clear reason why

2018-08-01 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 13:43 -0600, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > Here is the corosync.log for the first host in the list at the > indicated time.  Not sure what it's doing or why - all cluster nodes > were up and running the entire time...no fencing events. > > Jul 30 21:46:30 [3878] q-gp2-dbpg57-1  

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fence agent executing thousands of API calls per hour

2018-08-01 Thread Casey & Gina
Actually, is it even necessary at all? Based on my other E-mail to the list (Fence agent ends up stopped with no clear reason why), it seems that sometimes the monitor fails with an "unknown error", resulting in a cluster that won't fail over due to inability to fence. I tried looking at the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fence agent executing thousands of API calls per hour

2018-08-01 Thread Casey & Gina
How is the interval adjusted? Based on an example I found online, I thought `pcs resource op monitor interval=15m vmware_fence` should work, but after executing that `pcs config` still shows a monitor interval of 60s. Thank you, -- Casey > On 2018-07-31, at 9:11 AM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fence agent ends up stopped with no clear reason why

2018-08-01 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
Here is the corosync.log for the first host in the list at the indicated time. Not sure what it's doing or why - all cluster nodes were up and running the entire time...no fencing events. Jul 30 21:46:30 [3878] q-gp2-dbpg57-1cib: info: cib_perform_op: Diff: --- 0.700.4 2 Jul

[ClusterLabs] Fence agent ends up stopped with no clear reason why

2018-08-01 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
Across our clusters, I see the fence agent stop working, with no apparent reason. It looks like shown below. I've found that I can do a `pcs resource cleanup vmware_fence` to cause it to start back up again in a few seconds, but why is this happening and how can I prevent it? vmware_fence

Re: [ClusterLabs] ban node or disable (all) resources upon node addition to the cluster - how?

2018-08-01 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > Hello, > > On 01/08/18 13:46 +0100, lejeczek wrote: > > is it possible to tell the cluster to exclude or ban resources to > > run on a node which I'd like to add the cluster? (as one command?) > > > > (or any other way that would assure

Re: [ClusterLabs] ban node or disable (all) resources upon node addition to the cluster - how?

2018-08-01 Thread Jan Pokorný
Hello, On 01/08/18 13:46 +0100, lejeczek wrote: > is it possible to tell the cluster to exclude or ban resources to > run on a node which I'd like to add the cluster? (as one command?) > > (or any other way that would assure that no resources would be moved to that > node, in case cluster would

Re: [ClusterLabs] SBD manual page redesigned

2018-08-01 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 08/01/2018 12:17 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > Reading the SBD manual page was a long-time frustrating process for me (it's > incomplete and sometimes hard to read, or it's hard to find the information > you are looking for), so I eventually started to document SBD somewhat better > in

[ClusterLabs] ban node or disable (all) resources upon node addition to the cluster - how?

2018-08-01 Thread lejeczek
hi guys is it possible to tell the cluster to exclude or ban resources to run on a node which I'd like to add the cluster? (as one command?) (or any other way that would assure that no resources would be moved to that node, in case cluster would decide for some reason that was a good idea)

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: SLES11 SP4:SBD fencing problem with Xen (NMI not handled)?

2018-08-01 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! One thing I found out in the meantime is that hpwdt ("HP iLO2+ HW Watchdog Timer") calls panic() in hpwdt_pretimeout(). However panic() never returns, and so the notify_die() from do_nmi() never finishes. Possibly this never worked, be it Xen or not. The interesting thing is that the HP

[ClusterLabs] SBD manual page redesigned

2018-08-01 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! Reading the SBD manual page was a long-time frustrating process for me (it's incomplete and sometimes hard to read, or it's hard to find the information you are looking for), so I eventually started to document SBD somewhat better in the manual page. Actually I was hoping to improve the

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: SLES11 SP4:SBD fencing problem with Xen (NMI not handled)?

2018-08-01 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 01.08.2018 um 08:28 in Nachricht <5149ea3c-3c14-57be-034e-4f1e0d8fb...@redhat.com>: > On 08/01/2018 08:06 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Hi Klaus, >> >> sorry for the late response, but in the meantime I found out some more > facts: > np >> 1) Triggering of the