Re: [ClusterLabs] shutdown and restart of complete cluster due to power outage with UPS

2019-01-22 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 20:35 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 22.01.2019 20:00, Ken Gaillot пишет: > > On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 16:52 +0100, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > we have a new UPS which has enough charge to provide our 2-node > > > cluster with the periphery (SAN, switches ...)

Re: [ClusterLabs] shutdown and restart of complete cluster due to power outage with UPS

2019-01-22 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
22.01.2019 20:00, Ken Gaillot пишет: > On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 16:52 +0100, Lentes, Bernd wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we have a new UPS which has enough charge to provide our 2-node >> cluster with the periphery (SAN, switches ...) for a resonable time. >> I'm currently thinking of the shutdown- and

Re: [ClusterLabs] shutdown and restart of complete cluster due to power outage with UPS

2019-01-22 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 16:52 +0100, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Hi, > > we have a new UPS which has enough charge to provide our 2-node > cluster with the periphery (SAN, switches ...) for a resonable time. > I'm currently thinking of the shutdown- and restart-procedure of the > complete cluster when

[ClusterLabs] shutdown and restart of complete cluster due to power outage with UPS

2019-01-22 Thread Lentes, Bernd
Hi, we have a new UPS which has enough charge to provide our 2-node cluster with the periphery (SAN, switches ...) for a resonable time. I'm currently thinking of the shutdown- and restart-procedure of the complete cluster when the power is lost and does not come back soon. Then cluster is

Re: [ClusterLabs] Increasing Token Timeout Safe By Itself?

2019-01-22 Thread Eric Robinson
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Friesse > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2019 11:57 PM > To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed > ; Eric Robinson > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Increasing Token Timeout Safe By Itself? > > Eric Robinson napsal(a): > > I have a

Re: [ClusterLabs] PCMK_ipc_buffer recommendation

2019-01-22 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 21/01/19 16:38 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Sat, 2019-01-19 at 00:46 +0200, Michael Kolomiets wrote: > I wish there were a convenient formula, part of this non-straightforward evaluation is fact that some daemons connect to other local "mates" only intermittently, on an ad-hoc basis, if my

Re: [ClusterLabs] About the alerts

2019-01-22 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 22/01/19 12:46 +0100, Klaus Wenninger wrote: > On 01/22/2019 12:23 PM, T. Ladd Omar wrote: >> Will the pacemaker alerts re-execute the alerts scripts if  the >> external-scripts execute failed? > > Nope - at least not till execution was moved to lrmd (execd) - but I > don't think that this

Re: [ClusterLabs] About the alerts

2019-01-22 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 01/22/2019 12:23 PM, T. Ladd Omar wrote: > Will the pacemaker alerts re-execute the alerts scripts if  the > external-scripts execute failed? Nope - at least not till execution was moved to lrmd (execd) - but I don't think that this changed. Retries on resources are controlled by pengine