Roger --
Thank you, sir. That does help.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Zhou
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:56 AM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
; Eric Robinson
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Stupid DRBD/LVM Global Filter Question
On
30.10.2019 15:46, RAM PRASAD TWISTED ILLUSIONS пишет:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to set up a storage cluster with two nodes, both running debian
> buster. The two nodes called, duke and miles, have a LUN residing on a SAN
> box as their shared storage device between them. As you can see in
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 13:46 +0100, RAM PRASAD TWISTED ILLUSIONS wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to set up a storage cluster with two nodes, both running
> debian buster. The two nodes called, duke and miles, have a LUN
> residing on a SAN box as their shared storage device between them. As
Hi everyone,
I am trying to set up a storage cluster with two nodes, both running
debian buster. The two nodes called, duke and miles, have a LUN residing
on a SAN box as their shared storage device between them. As you can see
in the output of pcs status, all the demons are active and I can
>>> Eric Robinson schrieb am 29.10.2019 um 23:17 in
Nachricht
> If I have an LV as a backing device for a DRBD disk, can someone explain why
> I need an LVM filter? It seems to me that we would want the LV to be always
> active under both the primary and secondary DRBD devices, and there
Hi everyone,
I am trying to set up a storage cluster with two nodes, both running debian
buster. The two nodes called, duke and miles, have a LUN residing on a SAN
box as their shared storage device between them. As you can see in the
output of pcs status, all the demons are active and I can get
On 10/30/19 6:17 AM, Eric Robinson wrote:
> If I have an LV as a backing device for a DRBD disk, can someone explain
> why I need an LVM filter? It seems to me that we would want the LV to be
> always active under both the primary and secondary DRBD devices, and
> there should be no need or
